Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38176863›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Determining the impact of an artificial intelligence tool on the management of pulmonary nodules detected incidentally on CT (DOLCE) study protocol: a prospective, non-interventional multicentre UK study.

Emma O'Dowd, Marko Berovic, Matthew Callister, Christos V Chalitsios, Disha Chopra, Indrajeet Das, Adrian Draper, Justin L Garner, Fergus Gleeson, Sam Janes and 17 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05389774 (DOLCE), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05389774 recruitingnot on this map

DOLCE: Determining the Impact of Optellum's Lung Cancer Prediction (LCP) Artificial Intelligence Solution on Service Utilisation, Health Economics and Patient Outcomes

TypeobservationalSponsorNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustRan2023 to 2025Enrolled2,000ConditionsAI (Artificial Intelligence), Pulmonary Nodule, Solitary, Pulmonary Nodule, Multiple, Lung Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 16 institutions in 3 countries.

Emma O'DowdNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK emma.o'dowd@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6904-1327
Marko BerovicKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Matthew CallisterLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Christos V ChalitsiosUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Disha ChopraOptellum Ltd, Oxford, UK.
Indrajeet DasUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Adrian DraperRespiratory Medicine, St George's Hospital, London, UK.
Justin L GarnerRoyal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, London, UK.
Fergus GleesonOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Sam JanesUniversity College London, London, UK.
Martyn KennedyLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Richard LeeRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
Fabrizio MauriOptellum Ltd, Oxford, UK.
Tricia M McKeeverUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0914-0416
William McNultyKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
James MurrayRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Arjun NairUniversity College Hospital, London, UK.
John ParkOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Janette RawlinsonConsumer Forum, NCRI CSG (lung) Subgroup, BTOG Steering Committee, NHSE CEG, National Cancer Research Institute, London, UK.
Gurdeep Singh SagooPopulation Health Sciences Institute, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1427-1437
Andrew ScarsbrookLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Pallav ShahRoyal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Rajini SudhirUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Ambika TalwarOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Ricky ThakrarUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Johnathan WatkinsOptellum Ltd, Oxford, UK.
David R BaldwinNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBHarefield Hospital · GBNational Cancer Research Institute · GBNewcastle University · GBRoyal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBSt George's Hospital · GBUniversity College Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn a small percentage of patients, pulmonary nodules found on CT scans are early lung cancers. Lung cancer detected at an early stage has a much better prognosis. The British Thoracic Society guideline on managing pulmonary nodules recommends using multivariable malignancy risk prediction models to assist in management. While these guidelines seem to be effective in clinical practice, recent data suggest that artificial intelligence (AI)-based malignant-nodule prediction solutions might outperform existing models. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a prospective, observational multicentre study to assess the clinical utility of an AI-assisted CT-based lung cancer prediction tool (LCP) for managing incidental solid and part solid pulmonary nodule patients vs standard care. Two thousand patients will be recruited from 12 different UK hospitals. The primary outcome is the difference between standard care and LCP-guided care in terms of the rate of benign nodules and patients with cancer discharged straight after the assessment of the baseline CT scan. Secondary outcomes investigate adherence to clinical guidelines, other measures of changes to clinical management, patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been reviewed and given a favourable opinion by the South Central-Oxford C Research Ethics Committee in UK (REC reference number: 22/SC/0142).Study results will be available publicly following peer-reviewed publication in open-access journals. A patient and public involvement group workshop is planned before the study results are available to discuss best methods to disseminate the results. Study results will also be fed back to participating organisations to inform training and procurement activities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05389774.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesArtificial IntelligenceHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedUnited Kingdomchest imagingclinical trialcomputed tomographyradiology & imagingrespiratory tract tumours

Identifiers

PMID38176863
PMCPMC10773382
OpenAlexW4390631659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.