Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38176391›Full record

Trial reportPsychotherapy and psychosomatics2024

Effectiveness of Schema Therapy versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy versus Supportive Therapy for Depression in Inpatient and Day Clinic Settings: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Johannes Kopf-Beck, Celina L Müller, Jeanette Tamm, Julia Fietz, Nils Rek, Leah Just, Zoe Ilona Spock, Katharina Weweck, Keisuke Takano, Martin Rein and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Positive Constructs in Schema Therapy: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical psychology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Johannes Kopf-BeckMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Celina L MüllerMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Jeanette TammMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Julia FietzMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Nils RekMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Leah JustMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Zoe Ilona SpockMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Katharina WeweckMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Keisuke TakanoDepartment of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Martin ReinOberberg Tagesklinik München Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany.
Martin E KeckMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Samy EgliMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DELMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSchema therapy (ST) reduces depressive symptoms, but clinical trials have not investigated its effectiveness for patients suffering from severe forms of depression and high rates of comorbidities. There is high demand for exploring and improving treatments for this patient group. The objective of the current study was to evaluate whether ST is more effective than individual supportive therapy (IST) and noninferior compared with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in treating depression.

methodsFor this clinical trial, medicated patients were recruited in inpatient and day clinic settings. The major inclusion criteria were age between 18 and 75 years and primary diagnosis of depression without psychotic symptoms. A total of 292 participants were randomized to ST, CBT, or IST and received 7 weeks of psychotherapy (up to 14 individual and 14 group sessions). The primary outcome was change in depression severity after treatment measured by Beck Depression Inventory-II. Primary test for efficacy was superiority of ST over IST. Secondary test was noninferiority of ST compared with CBT. Multilevel modeling was conducted. The results at 6-month follow-up were explored.

resultsAcross treatment, ST was not superior to IST. Secondary outcome analyses and completer analyses showed similar results. However, ST showed clinically relevant noninferiority compared with CBT.

conclusionST for depression as part of a psychiatric care program showed clinical noninferiority compared to CBT, without being superior to IST. ST represents a potentially useful addition to the therapeutic repertoire for the treatment of depression but its efficacy, including long-term efficacy, should be evaluated further.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapySchema TherapyAdolescentAdultAgedDepressionHumansInpatientsMiddle AgedPsychotherapyTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCognitive behavioral therapyDepressionPsychotherapy researchRandomized controlled trialSchema therapy

Identifiers

PMID38176391
PMCPMC10880804
OpenAlexW4390574792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.