Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38176020›Full record

SynthesisPsychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research2025

Therapist and treatment credibility in treatment outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clients' perceptions in individual and face-to-face psychotherapies.

Güler Beril Kumpasoğlu, Chloe Campbell, Rob Saunders, Peter Fonagy

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Güler Beril KumpasoğluResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0505-1582
Chloe CampbellResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Rob SaundersResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7077-8729
Peter FonagyResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Anna Freud Centre · GBAnkara University · TRUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNo systematic review was identified investigating the influence of perceived therapist credibility on treatment outcomes. Extant treatment credibility reviews have focused on early perceptions without considering influence of various therapy phases. This study aimed to examine the relationship between perceived treatment and therapist credibility and treatment outcomes, while considering the timing of the credibility assessment as a potential moderator.

methodArticles published in English peer-reviewed journals containing at least one quantitative measure of credibility and treatment outcome regarding face-to-face therapist-delivered interventions were eligible. PsycINFO, MEDLINE and Embase online databases were last searched on April 5th, 2023, and the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool was used to assess the study quality. Correlations between treatment credibility and outcomes, and therapist credibility were calculated separately.

resultsAnalysis of 27 studies revealed a positive association between perceived treatment credibility and treatment outcome (

conclusionFindings suggest that clients' perceptions of higher credibility - whether concerning the treatment or the therapist - are associated with better therapeutic outcomes. Constraints in inclusion criteria and the small sample size in eligible studies were notable limitations.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareProfessional-Patient RelationsPsychotherapyHumanscommon factorstherapeutic relationshiptherapist credibilitytreatment credibilitytreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID38176020
PMCPMC11771474
OpenAlexW4390574790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.