Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38175837›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2024

Identifying opportunities to optimize mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: A visualization and descriptive analysis using process mapping.

Eileen Kazura, Jabaselvi Johnson, Chloe Morozoff, Kumudha Aruldas, Euripide Avokpaho, Comlanvi Innocent Togbevi, Félicien Chabi, Marie-Claire Gwayi-Chore, Providence Nindi, Angelin Titus and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03014167 (Field Studies on the Feasibility of Interrupting the Transmission of Soil-transmitted Helminths), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03014167 phase3completednot on this map

Field Studies on the Feasibility of Interrupting the Transmission of Soil-transmitted Helminths (STH) DeWorm3 Project

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2017 to 2024Enrolled357,716ConditionsHelminthiasis, FilariasisArmsAlbendazole
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Eileen KazuraThe Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7923-9636
Jabaselvi JohnsonThe Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Chloe MorozoffThe Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Kumudha AruldasThe Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Euripide AvokpahoInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Bénin, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.
Comlanvi Innocent TogbeviInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Bénin, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.
Félicien ChabiInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Bénin, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.
Marie-Claire Gwayi-ChoreThe Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Providence NindiBlantyre Institute for Community Outreach, Blantyre, Malawi.
Angelin TitusThe Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Parfait HoungbegnonInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Bénin, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.
Saravanakumar Puthupalayam KaliappanThe Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Yesudoss JacobThe Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
James SimwanzaBlantyre Institute for Community Outreach, Blantyre, Malawi.
Khumbo KaluaBlantyre Institute for Community Outreach, Blantyre, Malawi.
Judd L WalsonThe DeWorm3 Project, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Moudachirou IbikounléInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Bénin, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.
Sitara S R AjjampurThe Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Arianna Rubin MeansThe Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Christian Medical College, Vellore · INUniversity of Washington · USBlantyre Institute for Community Ophthalmology · MWUniversité d'Abomey-Calavi · BJ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe control of soil-transmitted helminths (STH) is achieved through mass drug administration (MDA) with deworming medications targeting children and other high-risk groups. Recent evidence suggests that it may be possible to interrupt STH transmission by deworming individuals of all ages via community-wide MDA (cMDA). However, a change in delivery platforms will require altering implementation processes.

methodsWe used process mapping, an operational research methodology, to describe the activities required for effective implementation of school-based and cMDA in 18 heterogenous areas and over three years in Benin, India, and Malawi. Planned activities were identified during workshops prior to initiation of a large cMDA trial (the DeWorm3 trial). The process maps were updated annually post-implementation, including adding or removing activities (e.g., adaptations) and determining whether activities occurred according to plan. Descriptive analyses were performed to quantify differences and similarities at baseline and over three implementation years. Comparative analyses were also conducted between study sites and areas implementing school-based vs. cMDA. Digitized process maps were developed to provide a visualization of MDA processes and inspected to identify implementation bottlenecks and inefficient activity flows.

resultsAcross three years and all clusters, implementation of cMDA required an average of 13 additional distinct activities and was adapted more often (5.2 adaptations per year) than school-based MDA. An average of 41% of activities across both MDA platforms did not occur according to planned timelines; however, deviations were often purposeful to improve implementation efficiency or effectiveness. Visualized process maps demonstrated that receipt of drugs at the local level may be an implementation bottleneck. Many activities rely on the effective setting of MDA dates and estimating quantity of drugs, suggesting that the timing of these activities is important to meet planned programmatic outcomes.

conclusionImplementation processes were heterogenous across settings, suggesting that MDA is highly context and resource dependent and that there are many viable ways to implement MDA. Process mapping could be deployed to support a transition from a school-based control program to community-wide STH transmission interruption program and potentially to enable integration with other community-based campaigns.

trial registrationNCT03014167.

Indexed as

AnthelminticsGlutamatesHelminthiasisHelminthsNitrogen Mustard CompoundsAnimalsChildHumansMass Drug AdministrationSoil4-((2-chloroethyl)(2-mesyloxyethyl)amino)benzoylglutamic acidAnthelminticsGlutamatesNitrogen Mustard CompoundsSoil

Identifiers

PMID38175837
PMCPMC10793904
OpenAlexW4390577372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.