Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38175545›Full record

ArticleResearch in nursing & health2024

Improving pain communication between limited English-speaking Hmong patients, medical interpreters, and health care providers in primary care: A pilot study.

Maichou Lor, Angie Li, Roger Brown, Matthew P Swedlund, John G Hawkins, Evan T Nolander, Betty Chewning

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in nursing & health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04975789 (Information Visualization to Improve Pain Communication Between Providers, Interpreters, and Patients With Limited English Proficiency), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04975789 nacompletednot on this map

Information Visualization to Improve Pain Communication Between Providers, Interpreters, and Patients With Limited English Proficiency

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2021 to 2023Enrolled61ConditionsCommunication, PainArmsInfoViz
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maichou LorSchool of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8451-4364
Angie LiSchool of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Roger BrownSchool of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Matthew P SwedlundDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
John G HawkinsM Health Fairview, Cottage Grove, Minnesota, USA.
Evan T NolanderDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Betty ChewningSchool of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Information Visualization to Improve Pain Communication Between Providers, Interpreters, and Patients with Limited English ProficiencyK23NR019289 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LOR, MAICHOU · 2020 to 2022
$480k
NINR NIH HHS K23 NR019289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This pilot study assessed the feasibility of implementing a pain assessment information visualization (InfoViz) tool to address cultural and language barriers among limited English proficiency (LEP) Hmong patients in primary care. We used a static group comparison design to collect data from 20 patient, interpreter, and provider triads under usual care (i.e., interpreter using verbal pain descriptions), followed by another 20 triads under the intervention (i.e., interpreter using verbal pain descriptions and the InfoViz tool). Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and retention rates, InfoViz tool completion, acceptability, and fidelity. We also assessed mutual understanding (MU) and pain electronic health record (EHR) documentation. Descriptive data were calculated and thematic analysis was conducted. Thirty-six LEP Hmong patients (n = 29 female, mean age = 59.03), 27 providers (n = 15 female), and four interpreters participated in this study. The patient recruitment rate was 18% while the retention rate was 81%. Interpreter recruitment rate was 80%, and 75% for retention rate. The intervention fidelity mean score was 83%. In the intervention condition, patient-provider MU of pain severity improved by 30%, coupled with a 28% increase in pain severity EHR documentation compared to usual care. While communication of pain quality did not improve, there was a higher mean number of pain descriptors (3.31 in the intervention vs. 1.79 in usual care) in EHR documentation. All participants had a positive experience with the tool, reporting it as valuable with 100% completeness of all tools. Findings revealed the tool was acceptable and feasible to use among LEP patients-interpreters-providers, providing support for an efficacy study.

Indexed as

CommunicationTranslatingCommunication BarriersFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMiddle AgedPainPilot ProjectsPrimary Health CareHmonginformation visualization toollimited English proficiency (LEP)pain communicationprimary care

Identifiers

PMID38175545
PMCPMC11079862
OpenAlexW4390579314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.