ArticleSpine deformity2024
Information exchange on adolescent scoliosis discussion forums among patients and caregivers: a thematic analysis.
Article in Spine deformity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOnline health-related support groups have increasingly become a regular resource for patients and caregivers; however, the content of these forums is largely unknown to medical teams. The purposes of this study were to (1) review posts from scoliosis discussion forums to establish common themes related to the care experience of patients with scoliosis and (2) understand how common themes vary among pediatric and adult patients, as well as caregivers.
methodsPosts were collected from two public scoliosis forums. Analysis was performed using grounded theory-a methodology that relies on the repeated analyses of qualitative data to identify recurring concepts, which are then coded and grouped into categories and ultimately central themes that seek to synthesize the relationships between categories. Information posts were reviewed by a board-certified orthopedic surgeon who performs scoliosis surgery for factual basis or misinformation.
resultsAnalysis of 911 posts revealed five central themes. The two most common themes among patients ≥ 18 and caregivers involve seeking out emotional support and information about surgical treatment. Patients < 18 frequently sought out emotional support but were also largely interested in information about bracing. The most prevalent theme among all contributors involved seeking out emotional support. There was very little medical misinformation found within posts.
conclusionScoliosis forums serve as an informal outlet where patients and families can offer emotional support and share experiences. Physicians should provide direct emotional support to patients and offer these forums as a resource, without significant concerns about propagating medical misinformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.