Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38175484›Full record

Observational studyObesity surgery2024

Perceived Benefits of Bariatric Surgery: Patient Perspectives.

Moath S Alsaqaaby, Khaled A Alabduljabbar, Heshma R Alruwaili, Karl J Neff, Helen M Heneghan, Dimitri J Pournaras, Carel W Le Roux

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Obesity surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Moath S AlsaqaabyDiabetes Complications Research Centre, Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Khaled A AlabduljabbarDiabetes Complications Research Centre, Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Heshma R AlruwailiDiabetes Complications Research Centre, Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Karl J NeffDiabetes Complications Research Centre, Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Helen M HeneghanDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, University College Dublin, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland.
Dimitri J PournarasDepartment of Upper GI and Bariatric Surgery, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Carel W Le RouxDiabetes Complications Research Centre, Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. carel.leroux@ucd.ie.ORCID 0000-0001-5521-5445
University College Dublin · IESouthmead Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity is a chronic and complex disease characterized by the excessive accumulation of adipose tissue, which has detrimental effects on health. Evaluating the changes in quality of life (QoL) after bariatric surgery complements the medical benefits which are documented by healthcare professionals. PURPOSE: To study the perceived health benefits 1 year after substantial weight loss induced by bariatric surgery.

methodsThis pilot study evaluated patients 1 year after bariatric surgery using 13 questions related to the health domains of the KOSS: airway, body mass, cardiovascular risk, diabetes, economic impact, functional, gonadal impact, health status perceived, image, junction of the gastro-esophagus, kidney, liver, and medication. In addition, the patients were asked to score the most significant benefit as "1," while the least beneficial benefit was scored as "13."

resultsOne hundred fourteen consecutive patients were evaluated (men = 37 and women = 77). The responses were divided into functional, metabolic, and mental/social benefits. Patients ranked the functional question, "I became more active, and I can do more things" as the most important (average score of 3.7 ± 0.2), followed by a question related to metabolic status: "I am less worried about my risk of heart disease" (4.5 ± 0.3), and then a social/mental question, "My clothes fit better" (5.4 ± 0.3). The three least valuable benefits for the cohort were sexual life improvements (8.9 ± 0.3), heartburn improvements (9.0 ± 0.3), and urinary incontinence improvements (9.8 ± 0.3).

conclusionsOur observational pilot study demonstrated that patients value functional benefits after substantial weight loss the most, but that metabolic benefits and social/mental health benefits are also considered important.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryObesity, MorbidFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsQuality of LifeWeight LossBariatric surgeryBenefitsKing’s Obesity Stage SystemQuality of lifeWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID38175484
OpenAlexW4390585553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.