Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38175469›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2024

The Need for European Surveillance of CDI.

Camilla Wiuff Coia, A-Lan Banks, Laura Cottom, Fidelma Fitzpatrick

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clostridioides difficile pathogenesis and control.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Camilla Wiuff CoiaDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark. cmwi@ssi.dk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1685-1913
A-Lan BanksSt. Helens & Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Whiston Hospital, Prescot, Merseyside, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9848-0895
Laura CottomDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4676-0713
Fidelma FitzpatrickDepartments of Clinical Microbiology, The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, and Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3204-5962

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the turn of the millennium, the epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has continued to challenge. Changes in clinical presentation, severity of disease, descriptions of new risk factors and the occurrence of outbreaks all emphasised the importance of early diagnosis and standardised surveillance systems. However, a lack of consensus on case definitions, clinical guidelines and optimal laboratory diagnostics across Europe has led to the underestimation of CDI and impeded comparison between countries. These inconsistencies have prevented the true burden of disease from being appreciated.Acceptance that a multi-country CDI surveillance program and optimised diagnostic strategies are required has built the foundations for a more robust, unified surveillance. The concerted efforts of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) CDI networks led to the development of the European surveillance protocol and an over-arching long-term CDI surveillance strategy for 2014-2020, which has been followed by the development of surveillance systems in at least 20 European countries. However, surveillance activities in individual countries have slowed during the COVID-19 pandemic as resources were diverted to the global health crisis. A renewed and strengthened focus on CDI surveillance and prevention is therefore urgently needed post COVID-19.

Indexed as

Clostridium InfectionsCOVID-19Disease OutbreaksEuropeHumansPandemicsCapacity buildingCollaborative effortEpidemiologyStandardisationSurveillance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.