ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2024
Analysis of Macular Pigment Optical Density in Macular Holes with Different Border Phenotypes.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Macular Pigment Optical Density Levels Reflect Retinal Remodeling in Lamellar Macular Holes.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Observational
- Feasibility Study of Decellularized Corneal Lenticule in a Porcine Model for Macular Hole Closure.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Changes in Choroidal Structure Associated with Idiopathic Macular Hole Border Morphology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- OCT analysis and MPOD assessment in patients affected by retinitis pigmentosa.Scientific reports · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe conducted a cross-sectional study to compare macular pigment optical density (MPOD) in eyes with idiopathic macular holes with bumpy (bbMH) and smooth borders (sbMH) and to assess the relation between MPOD and optical coherence tomography findings. Thirty eyes from thirty patients affected by idiopathic macular hole were studied.
methodsAll patients underwent SD-OCT and macular pigment optical density (MPOD) analysis. Comparison between the two border phenotypes were estimated at baseline, as well as the differences in MPOD, minimum and basal hole diameter, tractional hole index (THI), macular hole index (MHI), diameter hole index (DHI), and ELM integrity metrics between the two groups.
resultsThe mean MPOD was 0.09 ± 0.08 in bbMHs and 0.16 ± 0.11 in sbMHs (p = 0.010). Correlation analysis between MPOD and minimum hole diameter revealed a negative association (rho = - 0.707, p = 0.008) in bbMH and a positive association (rho = 0.702, p = 0.019) in sbMH. MPOD and basal diameter were negatively correlated in bbMH (rho = - 0.77, p = 0.001) and positively correlated in sbMH (rho = 0.675, p = 0.019). Indeed, MPOD is negatively correlated with THI and MHI in sbMH (rho = - 0.684 p = 0.019; rho = - 0.665 p = 0.019, respectively) and positively correlated in bbMH (rho = 0.593 p = 0.037; rho = 0.658 p = 0.018, respectively).
conclusionsMPOD is significantly reduced in bbMHs compared to sbMHs. The two border phenotypes also differ for tractional and tangential indexes, possibly reflecting a different pathogenesis. Further studies are needed to understand the prognostic role of MPOD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.