Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38175459›Full record

Trial reportPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2024

A Hybrid Pragmatic and Factorial Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial for an Anti-racist, Multilevel Intervention to Improve Mental Health Equity in High Schools.

Marta I Mulawa, Sharron L Docherty, Donald E Bailey, Rosa M Gonzalez-Guarda, Isaac M Lipkus, Schenita D Randolph, Qing Yang, Wei Pan

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marta I MulawaDuke University School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. marta.mulawa@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9687-421X
Sharron L DochertyDuke University School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Donald E BaileyDuke University School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Rosa M Gonzalez-GuardaDuke University School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Isaac M LipkusDuke University School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Schenita D RandolphDuke University School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Qing YangDuke University School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Wei PanDuke University School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Science CoreP2CHD065563 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Giovanna M Merli · 2015 to 2026
$5.7M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD065563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic racism is pervasive in US society and disproportionately limits opportunities for education, work, and health for historically marginalized and minoritized racial and ethnic groups, making it an urgent issue of social justice. Because systemic racism is a social determinant of health prevalent across multiple social and institutional structures, it requires multilevel intervention approaches using effective designs and analytic methods to measure and evaluate outcomes. Racism is a fundamental cause of poor health outcomes, including mental health outcomes; thus, mental health services and programs that address racism and discrimination are key to promoting positive mental health of racial and ethnic minority youth. While multilevel interventions are well-suited for improving outcomes like youth mental health disparities, their evaluation poses unique methodological challenges, requiring specialized design and analytic approaches. There has been limited methodological guidance provided to researchers on how to test multilevel interventions using approaches that balance methodological rigor, practicality, and acceptability across stakeholder groups, especially within communities most affected by systemic racism. This paper addresses this gap by providing an example of how to rigorously evaluate a hypothetical, theoretically based, multilevel intervention promoting mental health equity in three US school systems using an anti-racist approach intervening at the macro- (i.e., school system), meso- (i.e., school), and micro- (i.e., family and student) levels to improve mental health in adolescents. We describe the design, sample size considerations, and analytic methods to comprehensively evaluate its effectiveness while exploring the extent to which the components interact synergistically to improve outcomes. The methodological approach proposed can be adapted to other multilevel interventions that include strategies addressing macro-, meso-, and micro-levels of influence.

Indexed as

Health EquityAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthRacismSchoolsCluster randomized controlled trialMental health equityMultilevel interventionsSystemic racismYouth

Identifiers

PMID38175459
PMCPMC11239747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.