Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38175449›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2024

Targeted axillary dissection: worldwide variations in clinical practice.

Michalis Kontos, Prodromos Kanavidis, Thorsten Kühn, Yazan Masannat, Bahadir Gulluoglu, TAD Study Group

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Michalis Kontos *National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Prodromos Kanavidis *National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. makis.k@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2819-472X
Thorsten KühnUniversity of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Yazan MasannatBroomfield Hospital, Mid and South Essex NHS Trust, Chelmsford, UK, Broomfield, UK.
Bahadir GulluogluMarmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
TAD Study Group
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRMarmara University · TRUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTargeted axillary dissection (TAD) for the axillary staging of clinically node-positive (cN +) breast cancer patients converting to clinically node negative post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), has gained popularity due to its minimal false negative rate and low arm morbidity. The aim of this study is to shed more light on the variation in the clinical practice globally in terms of indications and perceived limitations of TAD.

methodsA panel of expert breast surgeons constructed a structured questionnaire comprising of 18 questions and asked surgeons worldwide for their opinions and routine practice on TAD. The questionnaire was electronically distributed and answers were collected between May 1st and August 1st 2022.

resultsResponses included 137 entries from 36 countries. Of them, 73.7% consider TAD for cN + patients planned to receive NAC. Among them, the greatest number of respondents (45%) perform the procedure for tumours up to T3, whereas 27% regardless of T-stage. The majority (42%) perform TAD on patients with 1-3 positive nodes and only 30% consider TAD when matted nodes are present. HER2 positive and Triple Negative subtypes are more likely to undergo TAD than Luminal A and B (86%, 79.1%, 39.5%, and 62.8%, respectively). Maximum acceptable lymph node burden is median 3 nodes for any subtype with a tendency to accept more positive nodes for Triple Negative.

conclusionThis study demonstrates the differences in current practice regarding TAD as well as the fact that the biology of the tumour heavily affects the method of axillary staging.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAxillaFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingAxillary stagingBreast cancerPreoperative chemotherapySentinel node biopsyTargeted axillary dissectionTumour subtypes

Identifiers

PMID38175449
OpenAlexW4390585621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.