ArticleJournal of hematopathology2023
Mixed-phenotype acute leukemia, T/megakaryoblastic: does it really exist?
Article in Journal of hematopathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute leukemia of ambiguous lineage: the known and the uncertain.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Immunophenotypically Defined Mixed-Phenotype Acute Leukemias: A Clinicopathologic Analysis of 52 Cases.EJHaem · 2026Article
- Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for mixed-phenotype acute leukemia: a single-center study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mixed-phenotype acute leukemias (MPAL) account for < 4% of all cases of acute leukemias. These are a heterogeneous group of leukemias grouped together by the WHO classification as "rare subtypes." The diagnosis and treatment of MPAL is extremely challenging particularly for low middle income countries. Of these, B/myeloid and T/myeloid combinations are relatively common subtypes. However, megakaryoblastic and erythroid lineages in combination with other lineages are still rare enough to not even be addressed in the WHO classification. To date, there have been only a few reports of mixed B or T cell and megakaryocytic or mixed B or T cell and erythroid leukemias. We report the clinical presentation, diagnostic profile, and disease course of MPAL cases with a biphenotypic pattern consistent with T/megakaryoblastic lineage which is not yet defined in WHO classification. These cases were phenotyped using 8-color flow cytometry (BD FACS CANTO-II) using an extensive panel of markers. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was done using dual color dual fusion probes for BCR::ABL1, RUNX1::RUNX1T1, and ETV6::RUNX1, while MLL and CBFB gene rearrangement was tested by break-apart probes. Karyotyping was performed using the conventional GTG-banding technique. Both FISH and karyotyping were analyzed by the automated cell imaging system Leica Biosystems, using Cytovision MB8. The cases presented here satisfy the criteria for both T-lineage assignment (cyCD3 intensity reaches that of normal T-lymphocytes) and acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (≥ 1 megakaryocytic marker in > 50% blasts) and thus represent the first documented examples of this unusual entity from Pakistan. It is crucial to report these cases to gather more data about clinical presentation, diagnostic profile, and disease course. Additionally, the reported cases highlight the limitations of existing classifications which do not address rare subtypes. More importantly, T/megakaryoblastic MPAL needs to be included in the WHO classification as a separate entity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38175376What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.