Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38175355›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2024

Exploring bacterial diversity in Arctic fjord sediments: a 16S rRNA-based metabarcoding portrait.

Bhavya Kachiprath, Solly Solomon, Jayanath Gopi, P R Jayachandran, Jabir Thajudeen, Manomi Sarasan, Anjali S Mohan, Jayesh Puthumana, E R Chaithanya, Rosamma Philip

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bhavya Kachiprath *Dept. of Marine Biology, Microbiology & Biochemistry, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin, Kerala, 682016, India.
Solly Solomon *Dept. of Marine Biology, Microbiology & Biochemistry, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin, Kerala, 682016, India.
Jayanath GopiApplied Research Center for Environment and Marine Studies, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
P R JayachandranApplied Research Center for Environment and Marine Studies, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Jabir ThajudeenNational Centre for Polar and Ocean Research, Ministry of Earth Sciences (Government of India), Headland Sada, Vasco-da-Gama, Goa, 403804, India.
Manomi SarasanNational Centre for Aquatic Animal Health, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin, Kerala, 682016, India.
Anjali S MohanDept. of Marine Biology, Microbiology & Biochemistry, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin, Kerala, 682016, India.
Jayesh PuthumanaNational Centre for Aquatic Animal Health, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin, Kerala, 682016, India.
E R ChaithanyaDept. of Marine Biology, Microbiology & Biochemistry, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin, Kerala, 682016, India.
Rosamma PhilipDept. of Marine Biology, Microbiology & Biochemistry, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin, Kerala, 682016, India. rosammap@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9493-4714

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The frosty polar environment houses diverse habitats mostly driven by psychrophilic and psychrotolerant microbes. Along with traditional cultivation methods, next-generation sequencing technologies have become common for exploring microbial communities from various extreme environments. Investigations on glaciers, ice sheets, ponds, lakes, etc. have revealed the existence of numerous microorganisms while details of microbial communities in the Arctic fjords remain incomplete. The current study focuses on understanding the bacterial diversity in two Arctic fjord sediments employing the 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding and its comparison with previous studies from various Arctic habitats. The study revealed that Proteobacteria was the dominant phylum from both the fjord samples followed by Bacteroidetes, Planctomycetes, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Chloroflexi and Chlamydiae. A significant proportion of unclassified reads derived from bacteria was also detected. Psychrobacter, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Aeromonas, Photobacterium, Flavobacterium, Gramella and Shewanella were the major genera in both the fjord sediments. The above findings were confirmed by the comparative analysis of fjord metadata with the previously reported (secondary metadata) Arctic samples. This study demonstrated the potential of 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding in resolving bacterial composition and diversity thereby providing new in situ insights into Arctic fjord systems.

Indexed as

Geologic SedimentsMicrobiotaArctic RegionsBacteriaEstuariesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SArctic fjordsKongsfjordenKrossfjordenmetabarcodingMG-RAST

Identifiers

PMID38175355
PMCPMC10920534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.