Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38175323›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2024

Application of behavioural theories, models, and frameworks in pharmacy practice research based on published evidence: a scoping review.

Zachariah Nazar, Lina Mohammad Naseralallah, Derek Stewart, Vibhu Paudyal, Laila Shafei, Anita Weidmann

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of pharmacist care on clinical outcomes and therapy optimization in perioperative settings: A systematic review.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zachariah NazarCollege of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar. znazar@qu.edu.qa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4104-4221
Lina Mohammad NaseralallahPharmacy Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3035-1357
Derek StewartCollege of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7360-8592
Vibhu PaudyalSchool of Pharmacy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4173-6490
Laila ShafeiCollege of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9473-9505
Anita WeidmannDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Innsbruck University, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3670-2357

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacy practice research often focuses on the design, implementation and evaluation of pharmacy services and interventions. The use of behavioural theory in intervention research allows understanding of interventions' mechanisms of action and are more likely to result in effective and sustained interventions.

aimTo collate, summarise and categorise the reported behavioural frameworks, models and theories used in pharmacy practice research.

methodPubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science and EBSCO (CINAHL PLUS, British Education index, ERIC) were systematically searched to capture all pharmacy practice articles that had reported the use of behavioural frameworks, theories, or models since inception of the database. Results were filtered to include articles published in English in pharmacy practice journals. Full-text screening and data extraction were independently performed by two reviewers. A narrative synthesis of the data was adopted. Studies were reviewed for alignment to the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) framework to identify in which phase(s) of the research that the theory/model/framework had been employed.

resultsFifty articles met the inclusion criteria; a trend indicating an increasing frequency of behavioural theory/frameworks/models within pharmacy practice research was identified; the most frequently reported were Theory of Planned Behaviour and Theoretical Domains Framework. Few studies provided explicit and comprehensive justification for adopting a specific theory/model/framework and description of how it underpinned the research was lacking. The majority were investigations exploring determinants of behaviours, or facilitators and barriers to implementing or delivering a wide range of pharmacy services and initiatives within a variety of clinical settings (aligned to Phase 1 UK MRC framework).

conclusionThis review serves as a useful resource for future researchers to inform their investigations. Greater emphasis to adopt a systematic approach in the reporting of the use of behavioural theories/models/frameworks will benefit pharmacy practice research and will support researchers in utilizing behavioural theories/models/framework in aspects of pharmacy practice research beyond intervention development.

Indexed as

Pharmacy ResearchHumansPharmaceutical ServicesBehavioural theoryPharmacyPharmacy researchScoping reviewTheoretical framework

Identifiers

PMID38175323
PMCPMC11133055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.