Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38175314›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2024

Exploring attitudes and experiences with reproductive genetic carrier screening among couples seeking medically assisted reproduction: a longitudinal survey study.

Eva Van Steijvoort, Mathilde Cassou, Camille De Schutter, Eftychia Dimitriadou, Hilde Peeters, Karen Peeraer, Gert Matthijs, Pascal Borry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eva Van SteijvoortDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 bus 7001 3000, Leuven, Belgium. eva.vansteijvoort@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3134-4028
Mathilde CassouDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 bus 7001 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Camille De SchutterDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 bus 7001 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Eftychia DimitriadouDepartment of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Hilde PeetersDepartment of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Karen PeeraerDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Gert MatthijsDepartment of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Pascal BorryDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 bus 7001 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

Research Fund Flanders G094518N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to assess the attitudes and experiences of subfertile couples applying for medically assisted reproduction (MAR) using their own gametes towards reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) for monogenic conditions.

methodsA prospective survey study was conducted where subfertile couples were recruited from the fertility centre of a university hospital in Flanders, Belgium. Participants were offered RGCS free of charge and completed self-administered questionnaires at three different time points.

resultsThe study sample consisted of 26 couples. Most participants had no children, did not consider themselves as religious, and had some form of higher education. Overall, attitudes towards RGCS were mostly positive and the intention to participate in RGCS was high. Anxiety scores were only elevated and clinically relevant for a limited number of participants. A large proportion of participants would consider preventive reproductive options like prenatal diagnosis or in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) combined with pre-implantation genetic testing for monogenic conditions (PGT-M) in the event of an increased likelihood of conceiving a child with a hereditary condition. Participants were satisfied with their decision to undergo RGCS, and the majority would recommend RGCS to other couples.

conclusionOur study findings suggest that subfertile couples applying for MAR using their own gametes find RGCS acceptable and have a positive attitude towards it. This study provides valuable insights into the perspectives of these couples, highlighting the need for appropriate counseling and timely information provision.

Indexed as

ReproductionSemenChildFemaleGenetic Carrier ScreeningHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePregnancyProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitudesExperiencesMedically assisted reproductionReproductive genetic carrier screeningSubfertility

Identifiers

PMID38175314
PMCPMC10894802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.