Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38175255›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024

Assessing the robustness of a machine-learning model for early detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDA): evaluating resilience to variations in image acquisition and radiomics workflow using image perturbation methods.

Sovanlal Mukherjee, Panagiotis Korfiatis, Nandakumar G Patnam, Kamaxi H Trivedi, Aashna Karbhari, Garima Suman, Joel G Fletcher, Ajit H Goenka

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sovanlal MukherjeeDivisions of Abdominal and Nuclear Imaging, Nuclear Radiology Fellowship, Nuclear Radiology Research Operations, Enterprise PET/MR Research and Development, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Charlton 1, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Panagiotis KorfiatisDivisions of Abdominal and Nuclear Imaging, Nuclear Radiology Fellowship, Nuclear Radiology Research Operations, Enterprise PET/MR Research and Development, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Charlton 1, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Nandakumar G PatnamDivisions of Abdominal and Nuclear Imaging, Nuclear Radiology Fellowship, Nuclear Radiology Research Operations, Enterprise PET/MR Research and Development, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Charlton 1, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Kamaxi H TrivediDivisions of Abdominal and Nuclear Imaging, Nuclear Radiology Fellowship, Nuclear Radiology Research Operations, Enterprise PET/MR Research and Development, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Charlton 1, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Aashna KarbhariDivisions of Abdominal and Nuclear Imaging, Nuclear Radiology Fellowship, Nuclear Radiology Research Operations, Enterprise PET/MR Research and Development, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Charlton 1, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Garima SumanDivisions of Abdominal and Nuclear Imaging, Nuclear Radiology Fellowship, Nuclear Radiology Research Operations, Enterprise PET/MR Research and Development, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Charlton 1, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Joel G FletcherDivisions of Abdominal and Nuclear Imaging, Nuclear Radiology Fellowship, Nuclear Radiology Research Operations, Enterprise PET/MR Research and Development, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Charlton 1, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Ajit H GoenkaDivisions of Abdominal and Nuclear Imaging, Nuclear Radiology Fellowship, Nuclear Radiology Research Operations, Enterprise PET/MR Research and Development, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Charlton 1, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. goenka.ajit@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7804-2695
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Optimizing Pancreatic Cancer Management with Next Generation Imaging and Liquid BiopsyR01CA256969 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Eric Collisson, Ajit Harishkumar Goenka · 2021 to 2026
$3.1M
Quantitative In Vivo 68Ga-Fibroblast-Activation-Protein-Inhibitors (FAPI)-46 PET Imaging of Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts (CAFs) in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDA)R01CA272628 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GOENKA, AJIT HARISHKUMAR · 2022 to 2025
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA256969NCI NIH HHS R01CA256969NCI NIH HHS R01 CA272628NCI NIH HHS R01CA272628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate robustness of a radiomics-based support vector machine (SVM) model for detection of visually occult PDA on pre-diagnostic CTs by simulating common variations in image acquisition and radiomics workflow using image perturbation methods.

methodsEighteen algorithmically generated-perturbations, which simulated variations in image noise levels (σ, 2σ, 3σ, 5σ), image rotation [both CT image and the corresponding pancreas segmentation mask by 45° and 90° in axial plane], voxel resampling (isotropic and anisotropic), gray-level discretization [bin width (BW) 32 and 64)], and pancreas segmentation (sequential erosions by 3, 4, 6, and 8 pixels and dilations by 3, 4, and 6 pixels from the boundary), were introduced to the original (unperturbed) test subset (n = 128; 45 pre-diagnostic CTs, 83 control CTs with normal pancreas). Radiomic features were extracted from pancreas masks of these additional test subsets, and the model's performance was compared vis-a-vis the unperturbed test subset.

resultsThe model correctly classified 43 out of 45 pre-diagnostic CTs and 75 out of 83 control CTs in the unperturbed test subset, achieving 92.2% accuracy and 0.98 AUC. Model's performance was unaffected by a three-fold increase in noise level except for sensitivity declining to 80% at 3σ (p = 0.02). Performance remained comparable vis-a-vis the unperturbed test subset despite variations in image rotation (p = 0.99), voxel resampling (p = 0.25-0.31), change in gray-level BW to 32 (p = 0.31-0.99), and erosions/dilations up to 4 pixels from the pancreas boundary (p = 0.12-0.34).

conclusionThe model's high performance for detection of visually occult PDA was robust within a broad range of clinically relevant variations in image acquisition and radiomics workflow.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaPancreatic NeoplasmsResilience, PsychologicalHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedWorkflowMachine-learningPancreasPancreatic ductal carcinomaRadiomicsX-ray computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID38175255
PMCPMC12285573
OpenAlexW4390583128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.