ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Feasibility study on the clinical application of CT-based synthetic brain T1-weighted MRI: comparison with conventional T1-weighted MRI.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical applications of generative artificial intelligence in radiology: image translation, synthesis, and text generation.BJR artificial intelligence · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to examine the equivalence of computed tomography (CT)-based synthetic T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) to conventional T1WI for the quantitative assessment of brain morphology. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis prospective study examined 35 adult patients undergoing brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT scans. An image synthesis method based on a deep learning model was used to generate synthetic T1WI (sT1WI) from CT data. Two senior radiologists used sT1WI and conventional T1WI on separate occasions to independently measure clinically relevant brain morphological parameters. The reliability and consistency between conventional and synthetic T1WI were assessed using statistical consistency checks, comprising intra-reader, inter-reader, and inter-method agreement.
resultsThe intra-reader, inter-reader, and inter-method reliability and variability mostly exhibited the desired performance, except for several poor agreements due to measurement differences between the radiologists. All the measurements of sT1WI were equivalent to that of T1WI at 5% equivalent intervals.
conclusionThis study demonstrated the equivalence of CT-based sT1WI to conventional T1WI for quantitatively assessing brain morphology, thereby providing more information on imaging diagnosis with a single CT scan. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Real-time synthesis of MR images from CT scans reduces the time required to acquire MR signals, improving the efficiency of the treatment planning system and providing benefits in the clinical diagnosis of patients with contraindications such as presence of metal implants or claustrophobia. KEY POINTS: • Deep learning-based image synthesis methods generate synthetic T1-weighted imaging from CT scans. • The equivalence of synthetic T1-weighted imaging and conventional MRI for quantitative brain assessment was investigated. • Synthetic T1-weighted imaging can provide more information per scan and be used in preoperative diagnosis and radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38175218What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.