ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2024
Within-talker and within-session stability of acoustic characteristics of conversational and clear speaking stylesa).
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Screening to Precision: Searching for Voice Disorder-Specific Acoustic and Auditory-Perceptual Metrics.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2025Article
- Exploring Agreement in Voice Acoustic Parameters: A Repeated Measures Case Study Across Varied Recording Instruments, Speech Samples, and Daily Timeframes.Acoustics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Sensitivity of Acoustic Voice Quality Measures in Simulated Reverberation Conditions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Personality Traits and Self-Reported Vocal Fatigue and Other Voice Measures Among Teachers.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In speech production research, talkers often perform a speech task several times per recording session with different speaking styles or in different environments. For example, Lombard speech studies typically have talkers speak in several different noise conditions. However, it is unknown to what degree simple repetition of a speech task affects speech acoustic characteristics or whether repetition effects might offset or exaggerate effects of speaking style or environment. The present study assessed speech acoustic changes over four within-session repetitions of a speech production taskset performed with two speaking styles recorded in separate sessions: conversational and clear speech. In each style, ten talkers performed a set of three speech tasks four times. Speaking rate, median fundamental frequency, fundamental frequency range, and mid-frequency spectral energy for read sentences were measured and compared across test blocks both within-session and between the two styles. Results indicate that statistically significant changes can occur from one repetition of a speech task to the next, even with a brief practice set and especially in the conversational style. While these changes were smaller than speaking style differences, these findings support using a complete speech set for training while talkers acclimate to the task and to the laboratory environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.