ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2024
Is pitolisant safe for clinical use? A retrospective pharmacovigilance study focus on the post-marketing safety.
Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heterogeneity in adverse events associated with lumateperone: a study on potential subgroup-specific differences.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Adverse events associated with tirzepatide: a focus on subgroup-specific differences.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Article
- Pitolisant-associated mania - a case report.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- A real-world study on the treatment of pediatric narcolepsy with pitolisant in China.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Observational
- Potential heterogeneity of epcoritamab associated adverse events in demographics and dosing regimens.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Safety profiles of cyclosporine and tacrolimus in pregnancy: a pharmacovigilance analysis using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Exploration of adverse event profiles for cefotaxime: a disproportionality analysis using the FDA adverse event reporting system.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Article
- Exploration of adverse event profiles for glofitamab: A disproportionality analysis using the FDA adverse event reporting system.PloS one · 2025Article
- Safety profiles of sevoflurane in pediatric patients: a real-world pharmacovigilance assessment based on the FAERS database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Adverse event profiles of selpercatinib: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on FAERS database.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Post-marketing safety concerns with rimegepant based on a pharmacovigilance study.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Article
- A real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system events for Capmatinib.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Is pitolisant safe for clinical use? A retrospective pharmacovigilance study focus on the post-marketing safety.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2024Article
- A retrospective pharmacovigilance study of post-marketing safety concerns with cefuroxime.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pitolisant, a novel histamine H3-receptor antagonist, holds significant promise for treating narcolepsy. However, a petition, which highlighted that pitolisant was associated with deaths during clinical trials, has propelled it into the spotlight of widespread societal attention on April 3, 2023. Till now, the clinical safety of pitolisant remains a heatedly debated topic. This study aimed to offer a comprehensive assessment of the safety profile of pitolisant in real-world clinical settings. Adverse event reports where pitolisant was the primary suspect drug were extracted from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. The clinical characteristics and concomitant drugs of the pitolisant-associated adverse events were analyzed. The potential adverse event signals of pitolisant were explored using four disproportionality analysis methods. Furthermore, the difference in pitolisant-associated adverse event signals was investigated concerning sex, age, weight, and dose. A total of 526 reports and 1695 adverse events with pitolisant as the primary suspected drug were identified. The most significant adverse event signals were generally mild and of short duration. The concomitant drugs of pitolisant were highly intricate, mainly included drugs for treating narcolepsy as well as antidepressants. Seven new significant adverse event signals emerged. The safety profile of pitolisant exhibited no significant differences across age and dose groups, although slight variations were observed in relation to sex and weight. The findings from reports of death and life-threatening outcomes underscore the importance of enhanced monitoring for cardiac and respiratory adverse reactions when utilizing pitolisant. This study provided a broader understanding of the safety profile of pitolisant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.