Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38174838›Full record

ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2024

Is pitolisant safe for clinical use? A retrospective pharmacovigilance study focus on the post-marketing safety.

Cheng Jiang, Jiancheng Qian, Xin Jiang, Shuohan Zhang, Junxian Zheng, Hongwei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A real-world study on the treatment of pediatric narcolepsy with pitolisant in China.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cheng JiangZhejiang Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8454-749X
Jiancheng QianZhejiang Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xin JiangWenling Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Wenling, Zhejiang, China.
Shuohan ZhangHangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Junxian ZhengZhejiang Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Hongwei WangZhejiang Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

Medical Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province 2023RC141National Natural Science Foundation of China 82174132Public Service Technology Research Project of Zhejiang Province LGF22H300010Special Scientific Research Project of Pharmaceutical Management in County-level Medical Community of Zhejiang Pharmaceutical Association 2020ZYYJC04State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Department-Zhejiang Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine Co-construction of Key Laboratory of Research on Prevention and Treatment for Depression Syndrome
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pitolisant, a novel histamine H3-receptor antagonist, holds significant promise for treating narcolepsy. However, a petition, which highlighted that pitolisant was associated with deaths during clinical trials, has propelled it into the spotlight of widespread societal attention on April 3, 2023. Till now, the clinical safety of pitolisant remains a heatedly debated topic. This study aimed to offer a comprehensive assessment of the safety profile of pitolisant in real-world clinical settings. Adverse event reports where pitolisant was the primary suspect drug were extracted from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. The clinical characteristics and concomitant drugs of the pitolisant-associated adverse events were analyzed. The potential adverse event signals of pitolisant were explored using four disproportionality analysis methods. Furthermore, the difference in pitolisant-associated adverse event signals was investigated concerning sex, age, weight, and dose. A total of 526 reports and 1695 adverse events with pitolisant as the primary suspected drug were identified. The most significant adverse event signals were generally mild and of short duration. The concomitant drugs of pitolisant were highly intricate, mainly included drugs for treating narcolepsy as well as antidepressants. Seven new significant adverse event signals emerged. The safety profile of pitolisant exhibited no significant differences across age and dose groups, although slight variations were observed in relation to sex and weight. The findings from reports of death and life-threatening outcomes underscore the importance of enhanced monitoring for cardiac and respiratory adverse reactions when utilizing pitolisant. This study provided a broader understanding of the safety profile of pitolisant.

Indexed as

NarcolepsyPharmacovigilanceHumansPiperidinesRetrospective StudiesPiperidinespitolisantadverse eventdisproportionality algorithmFDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)pharmacovigilancepitolisantpost-marketing safety

Identifiers

PMID38174838
PMCPMC10765455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.