Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38174830›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2024

A computed tomography urography-based machine learning model for predicting preoperative pathological grade of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Yanghuang Zheng, Hongjin Shi, Shi Fu, Haifeng Wang, Jincheng Wang, Xin Li, Zhi Li, Bing Hai, Jinsong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. MR Imaging of the Upper Urinary Tract: Techniques, Diagnostic Performance, and Imaging Biomarkers.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yanghuang ZhengDepartment of Urology, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0008-2997-9191
Hongjin ShiDepartment of Urology, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Shi FuDepartment of Urology, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Haifeng WangDepartment of Urology, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Jincheng WangDepartment of Urology, The First People's Hospital of Luliang County, Lijiang, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-1404-2968
Xin LiDepartment of Urology, The Cancer Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Zhi LiDepartment of Radiology, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Bing HaiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Jinsong ZhangDepartment of Urology, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDevelopment and validation of a computed tomography urography (CTU)-based machine learning (ML) model for prediction of preoperative pathology grade of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

methodsA total of 140 patients with UTUC who underwent CTU examination from January 2017 to August 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. Tumor lesions on the unenhanced, medullary, and excretory periods of CTU were used to extract Features, respectively. Feature selection was screened by the Pearson and Spearman correlation analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). The logistic regression (LR) was used to screen for independent influencing factors of clinical baseline characteristics. Machine learning models based on different feature datasets were constructed and validated using algorithms such as LR, RF, SVM, and XGBoost. By computing the selected features, a radiomics score was generated, and a diverse feature dataset was constructed. Based on the training set, 16 ML models were created, and their performance was evaluated using the validation set for metrics including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and others.

resultsThe training set consisted of 98 patients (mean age: 64.5 ± 10.5 years; 30 males), whereas the validation set consisted of 42 patients (mean age: 65.3 ± 9.78 years; 17 males). Hydronephrosis was the best independent influence factor (p < 0.05). The RF model had the best performance in predicting high-grade UTUC, with AUC of 0.914 (95% Confidence Interval [95%CI] 0.852-0.977) and 0.903 (95%CI 0.809-0.997) in the training set and validation set, and accuracy of 0.878 and 0.857, respectively.

conclusionsAn ML model based on the RF algorithm exhibits excellent predictive performance, offering a non-invasive approach for predicting preoperative high-grade UTUC.

Indexed as

Machine LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedUrographyAgedAlgorithmsCarcinoma, Transitional CellFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPreoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesROC CurveUrologic Neoplasmscarcinomamachine learningpathological graderadiomicsurinary tract

Identifiers

PMID38174830
PMCPMC10807597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.