Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38174706›Full record

SynthesisHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2024

How well does vaccine literacy predict intention to vaccinate and vaccination status? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Claudia Isonne, Jessica Iera, Antonio Sciurti, Erika Renzi, Maria Roberta De Blasiis, Carolina Marzuillo, Paolo Villari, Valentina Baccolini

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The still unexplored mediating role of vaccine literacy.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Claudia IsonneDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Jessica IeraDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Antonio SciurtiDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Erika RenziDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Maria Roberta De BlasiisDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Carolina MarzuilloDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Paolo VillariDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Valentina BaccoliniDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7873-7817

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review quantified the association of vaccine literacy (VL) and vaccination intention and status. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Any study, published until December 2022, that investigated the associations of interest were eligible. For each outcome, articles were grouped according to the vaccine administrated and results were narratively synthesized. Inverse-variance random-effect models were used to compare standardized mean values in VL domain(s) between the two groups: individuals willing vs. unwilling to get vaccinated, and individuals vaccinated vs. unvaccinated. This review of 18 studies shows that VL strongly predicts the vaccination intention while its association with vaccination status is attenuated and barely significant, suggesting that other factors influence the actual vaccination uptake. However, given the scarce evidence available, the heterogeneity in the methods applied and some limitations of the studies included, further research should be conducted to confirm the role of VL in the vaccination decision-making process.

Indexed as

IntentionVaccinesHealth LiteracyHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinationVaccinesmeta-analysissystematic reviewvaccinationvaccination behaviorVaccine literacy

Identifiers

PMID38174706
PMCPMC10773666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.