Trial reportIndian journal of pharmacology
Comparative evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of apremilast and methotrexate in patients of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis: A randomized, parallel, open-label clinical trial.
Trial report in Indian journal of pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVariable results about efficacy as well as safety of apremilast compared to methotrexate are reported in different trials. Hence, it is necessary to collect more evidence to prove the role of Apremilast in palmoplantar psoriasis. METHODOLOGY: The study was a randomized, prospective, parallel-group, open-label study conducted in patients with moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis. They were randomized into two groups, methotrexate (n = 19) or apremilast (22) for 16 weeks. Primary efficacy parameter was reduction in modified palmoplantar psoriasis area and severity index (mPPPASI) score from week 0 to week 16. Other parameters were proportion of patients attaining Static Physician Global Assessment score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear), proportion of patients attaining mPPPASI75 (75% reduction in mPPPASI score) at the end of 16 weeks, and proportion of patients showing at least 5-point decline in dermatology life quality index from baseline.
resultsDecline in m-PPPASI score from 0 week to 16 weeks within the group was significant statistically though decline in score of m-PPPASI between these two groups was not statistically significant at 16 weeks. Similar results were obtained with the secondary efficacy parameters. In methotrexate group, there were 24 adverse events recorded including abnormal liver function tests in three patients. In apremilast group, 19 adverse events were recorded, in which two patients suffered from upper respiratory tract infection.
conclusionApremilast is as effective as methotrexate for the management of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis with better tolerability. Hence, it can be considered alternative to established drugs in patients having palmoplantar psoriasis not responding to or tolerating other drugs. REGISTRATION: The study was registered with Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2020/05/025198).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.