Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38174349›Full record

ArticleNew media & society2024

Digital contact does not promote wellbeing, but face-to-face contact does: A cross-national survey during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Martha Newson, Yi Zhao, Marwa El Zein, Justin Sulik, Guillaume Dezecache, Ophelia Deroy, Bahar Tunçgenç

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in New media & society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Comparing the effects of reduced social contact on psychosocial wellbeing before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal survey from two Norwegian counties.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Martha NewsonUniversity of Kent, UK; University of Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7700-9562
Yi ZhaoIndiana University, USA.
Marwa El ZeinUniversity College London, UK; Max-Planck for Human Development, Germany.
Justin SulikLudwig Maximilian University, Germany.
Guillaume DezecacheUniversité Clermont Auvergne, LAPSCO, CNRS, France.
Ophelia DeroyLudwig Maximilian University, Germany; University of London, UK.
Bahar TunçgençUniversity of Nottingham, UK; University of Oxford, UK.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRIndiana University · USLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMax Planck Institute for Human Development · DEUniversity of Kent · GBUniversity of London · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T041099/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With restricted face-to-face interactions, COVID-19 lockdowns and distancing measures tested the capability of computer-mediated communication to foster social contact and wellbeing. In a multinational sample (

Indexed as

Computer-mediated communicationCOVID-19 pandemicempathyface-to-face contactgendermodes of contactsocial interactionwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID38174349
PMCPMC10758341
OpenAlexW4200104492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.