Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38174334›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Application of artificial intelligence in the assessment of thyroid eye disease (TED) - a scoping review.

Chiaw-Ling Chng, Kaiping Zheng, Ann Kerwen Kwee, Ming-Han Hugo Lee, Daniel Ting, Chen Pong Wong, Guoyu Hu, Beng Chin Ooi, Si Wei Kheok

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Bibliometrics in thyroid eye disease.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Thyroid gland dysfunction and keratoconus.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chiaw-Ling ChngDepartment of Endocrinology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Kaiping ZhengSchool of Computing, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ann Kerwen KweeDepartment of Endocrinology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Ming-Han Hugo LeeOculoplastic Department, Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, SW, Australia.
Daniel TingSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Chen Pong WongDepartment of Neuroradiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Guoyu HuSchool of Computing, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Beng Chin OoiSchool of Computing, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Si Wei KheokDepartment of Neuroradiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Singapore General Hospital · SGNational University of Singapore · SGSingapore Eye Research Institute · SGSydney Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is emerging evidence which suggests the utility of artificial intelligence (AI) in the diagnostic assessment and pre-treatment evaluation of thyroid eye disease (TED). This scoping review aims to (1) identify the extent of the available evidence (2) provide an in-depth analysis of AI research methodology of the studies included in the review (3) Identify knowledge gaps pertaining to research in this area. Methods: This review was performed according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement (PRISMA). We quantify the diagnostic accuracy of AI models in the field of TED assessment and appraise the quality of these studies using the modified QUADAS-2 tool. Results: A total of 13 studies were included in this review. The most common AI models used in these studies are convolutional neural networks (CNN). The majority of the studies compared algorithm performance against healthcare professionals. The overall risk of bias and applicability using the modified Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool led to most of the studies being classified as low risk, although higher deficiency was noted in the risk of bias in flow and timing. Conclusions: While the results of the review showed high diagnostic accuracy of the AI models in identifying features of TED relevant to disease assessment, deficiencies in study design causing study bias and compromising study applicability were noted. Moving forward, limitations and challenges inherent to machine learning should be addressed with improved standardized guidance around study design, reporting, and legislative framework.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGraves OphthalmopathyAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, Computerartificial intelligenceconvolutional neural networksGraves’ ophthalmologyGraves orbitopathythyroid eye disease

Identifiers

PMID38174334
PMCPMC10761414
OpenAlexW4390007034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.