ArticleFrontiers in health services2023
Co-implementation: collaborative and concurrent approaches to advance embedded implementation in the health sciences.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond co-creation: why community-centered research ecosystems and advancing community research capacity building is implementation science's next frontier.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Participatory research in mental health care services in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Harmonizing intervention, context, and implementation strategies with Context-Driven Co-Design (CD2).Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- The development of national learning collaborative for ePRO enabled RSM in oncology: insights for co-implementation.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- A Model and Descriptive Case Example for Partnered Implementation Playbook Development.Global implementation research and applications · 2026Article
- Neglected tropical diseases elimination in Africa: lessons from regional control programmes.Tropical medicine and health · 2025Review
- EMTReK Model for Advance Care Planning in Long-Term Care: Qualitative Findings from mySupport Study.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Co-Design or Faux-Design? Reflections on Co-Designing Safe Spaces for People in Emotional Distress or Suicidal Crisis in Australia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Co-Creation in Research: Further Reflections From the 'Co-Creating Safe Spaces' Project.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Supporting dementia caregivers: The role of "lived experience" and public health collaboration.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a global movement towards stakeholder engagement in healthcare research. This movement has been catalyzed by a need to create context relevant evidence of maximal utility to health service provision and policy. The concept of "co-implementation" has potential to inform and extend these discussions of partnership and to complement the growing literature on collaborative implementation. Attending to this concept may preempt conceptual confusion and provide opportunities for sustainable and context-responsive embedded research necessary for the strengthening of health systems. In this perspective article, I seek to advance the discussion of co-implementation through an examination of the concept and through consideration of it merits to the health sciences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.