ArticleCureus2023
Clinical and Radiographical Outcomes of Restorative Treatment With Stainless Steel Crowns Performed by Undergraduate Dental Students in Medina, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical outcomes and parental satisfaction of two stainless steel crown systems in pediatric patients: a retrospective observational cohort study.BMC oral health · 2026Observational
- Comparative Evaluation of Esthetic Zirconia Crowns in Children: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Knowledge, Awareness, and Use of Stainless-Steel Crowns Among Dental Professionals in Sana'a City, Yemen.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Stainless steel crown (SSC) placement has long been the preferred restorative treatment modality for treating multi-surface carious primary molars. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of SSC placement on primary molars performed by undergraduate dental students. Materials and methods A total of 112 children aged four to eight years were contacted for follow-ups 12 months after they underwent SSC restorations by fifth- or sixth-year female dental students in 2018-2020. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed by trained dentists to evaluate for signs of failure. Descriptive statistics were applied for categorical variables and a Chi-squared test was used to assess the relationship between failure rate and demographic variables (i.e., age, gender, and type of tooth). Results The majority of the included children were aged seven years, with females (52.7%) slightly outnumbering males (47.3%). The failure rate clinically was 17.8%, involving one or more of the following signs: pain (16.1%), poor crown adaptation (16.1%), improper marginal seal (13.4%), fistula (6.3%), and mobility (4.5%). The rate of failure as per radiological examinations was 15%, involving one or more of the following signs: furcation involvement (9.8%), periapical radiolucency (3.6%), and pathological root resorption (1.8%). No significant association was found between failure rate and age, gender, or type of tooth. Conclusions The restorative treatment of primary molars with SSCs exhibited a high success rate when performed by less experienced undergraduate dental students from different academic levels. The failure rate did not appear to be associated with the child's age and gender or the type of tooth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.