ArticleCureus2023
Impact of Anaemia on HbA1c Interpretation Among Normogylcaemic Individuals With Diabetes Mellitus: A Clinical Laboratory Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Routine Haematological Parameters Associated with HbA1c and Estimated Whole-Blood Viscosity in Diabetes Management: An Exploratory AIC-Based Regression Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Long Term Cardiovascular Safety of Testosterone Therapy: A Review of the TRAVERSE Study.The world journal of men's health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimOver the past decades, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) has been a gold standard for monitoring diabetes control over a long period, relative to blood glucose level (BGL) which measures short-term results. It is speculated that anaemia and factors that induce haemolysis may cause falsely elevated HbA1c leading to 'false positive' interpretations. This study aimed to investigate how anaemia impacts HbA1c.
methodsThis was a pathology-based observational pilot study using archived data of diabetic subjects monitored with both BGL and HbA1c in regional New South Wales (NSW), Australia. A total of 28,487 cases of blood glucose results were pooled and those with HbA1c and anaemia results were evaluated for correlation with the BGL results. Data collection was limited to de-identified information from the laboratory information system, hence details on the ethnicity and medical history were unavailable. Descriptive frequencies and Pearson correlations were performed.
resultsIn the pooled data, 53.36% of individuals were females, and 50.54% had BGL ≥5.6 mmol/L. In the pilot dataset, the majority (64.86%) were males, 18.92% with BGL ≤5.6 mmol/L and 67.57% had HbA1c (≥6.5%). In the entire dataset, BGL was moderately and positively correlated with HbA1c (r = 0.6), whereas in the subset of individuals with normo-BGL and anaemia, the correlation was negative (r = -0.2). DISCUSSION: This pilot investigation observed a pertinent issue, which is a negative correlation between glycaemia and HbA1c in patients with anaemia. HbA1c was falsely increased despite normal blood glucose levels in individuals with anaemia. This advances the speculation that anaemia falsely increases HbA1c. Therefore, caution is necessary while interpreting HbA1c results for patients with anaemia, and new methods for interpretation are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.