Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38174133›Full record

ArticleTopics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation2023

Providing Insights into the Challenges of Implementing Activity-Based Therapy in Canada: A Comparative Analysis Using Focus Group Interviews with Key Interest Groups.

Anita Kaiser, Katherine Chan, James Sessford, Shane McCullum, Peter Athanasopoulos, Chris Rice, Jennifer Leo, Iona MacRitchie, José Zariffa, Kristin E Musselman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anita KaiserRehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Katherine ChanKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
James SessfordKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Shane McCullumStan Cassidy Centre for Rehabilitation, Horizon Health Network, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
Peter AthanasopoulosSpinal Cord Injury Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Chris RiceKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jennifer LeoThe Steadward Centre for Personal & Physical Achievement, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Iona MacRitchieToronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
José ZariffaRehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kristin E MusselmanRehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Activity-based therapy (ABT) has emerged as a therapeutic approach that may promote neurorecovery and reduce secondary complications in people living with spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D). In spite of the numerous health benefits, adoption of ABT into practice has been limited across the Canadian care continuum. Objectives: This study aimed to understand the challenges of implementing ABT in Canada for people living with SCI/D through the perspectives of key interest groups. Methods: Researchers, hospital therapists, community trainers, administrators, persons living with SCI/D, and advocates, funders, and policy experts who had knowledge of and/or experience with ABT participated in focus group interviews to share their perspectives on the barriers to ABT practice. Interviews were analyzed using conventional content analysis followed by a comparative analysis across groups. Results: The 48 participants identified six key challenges: (1) challenge of gaps in knowledge/training, (2) challenge of standardizing ABT, (3) challenge of determining the optimal timing of ABT, (4) challenge of defining, characterizing, and achieving high dosage and intensity, (5) challenge of funding ABT, and (6) challenge of measuring participation and performance in ABT. A comparative analysis found some challenges were emphasized by certain groups, such as the cost of ABT for persons with SCI/D, lack of education and training in ABT for therapists and trainers, minimal evidence to develop guidelines for researchers and advocates, and funding ABT programs for administrators. Conclusion: Participants highlighted several challenges that limit ABT practice. Strategies to address these challenges will support successful implementation of ABT in Canada.

Indexed as

Public OpinionSpinal Cord InjuriesCanadaFocus GroupsHumansexercise therapyfocus groupsqualitative researchspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID38174133
PMCPMC10759825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.