Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38174132›Full record

ArticleTopics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation2023

The Orthotic Effects of Different Functional Electrical Stimulation Protocols on Walking Performance in Individuals with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Series.

Shirin Tajali, Stephanie N Iwasa, Vivian Sin, Sharmini Atputharaj, Naaz Desai Kapadia, Kristin E Musselman, Milos R Popovic, Kei Masani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shirin TajaliThe KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stephanie N IwasaThe KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Vivian SinThe KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sharmini AtputharajThe KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Naaz Desai KapadiaThe KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kristin E MusselmanThe KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Milos R PopovicThe KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kei MasaniThe KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of paralyzed muscles can facilitate walking after spinal cord injury (SCI). Objectives: To test the orthotic effects of different FES walking protocols on lower joint kinematics and walking speed. Methods: Three adults with incomplete SCI participated in this study. Their lower extremity motor scores and 10-meter walk test results were as follows: subject A: 50, 1.05 m/s, subject B: 44, 0.29 m/s, and subject C: 32, 0.27 m/s. Participants completed four conditions of over-ground walking including no FES and three bilateral FES-walking protocols as follows: multi-muscle stimulation (stimulation of quadriceps and gastrocnemius in the stance phase, and hamstring and tibialis anterior in the swing phase), drop foot (tibialis anterior stimulation), and flexor withdrawal (common peroneal nerve stimulation). The FES system obtained gait phase information from foot switches located under the individuals' heels. Three-dimensional kinematic analysis was undertaken to measure minimum toe clearance (MTC); ankle, knee, and hip range of motion (ROM); stride length; and stride speed. Results: Compared to no-FES walking, MTC increased during drop foot (all subjects), flexor withdrawal (subjects A and B), and multi-muscle stimulation (subjects B and C) protocols. A significant decrease in ankle ROM was seen with drop foot (all subjects), flexor withdrawal (subjects A), and multi-muscle stimulation (subjects A and C) protocols. Hip ROM increased with drop foot (subjects B and C), flexor withdrawal (subject B), and multi-muscle stimulation (subject C) protocols. Conclusion: Three FES walking protocols induced positive kinematic changes as indicated by increased MTC, decreased ankle ROM, and increased hip ROM during walking in subjects with incomplete SCI.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapySpinal Cord InjuriesAdultElectric StimulationGaitHumansMuscle, SkeletalWalkingfunctional electrical stimulationorthotic effectspinal cord injurywalking

Identifiers

PMID38174132
PMCPMC10759841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.