ArticlePhotoacoustics2023
Ultrasound-guided needle tracking with deep learning: A novel approach with photoacoustic ground truth.
Article in Photoacoustics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human-AI Interaction in Interventional Radiology: A Narrative Review of Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- FM-Adapt: Foundation model adaptation with photoacoustic-supervised learning for interventional ultrasound.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Tracking performance and surgeon assessment of photoacoustic-based surgical guidance methods.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Current Status and Future Projections of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Ultrasonography and Needle Visibility Methods in Regional Anesthesia.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2026Article
- Real-Time In Vivo Cellular-Level Imaging During Puncture.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Fusing photoacoustic microscopy and ultrasound imaging: an artificial intelligence strategy for vessel enhancement in interventional guidance.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-guided acupotomy: a paradigm shift toward precision and safety in carpal tunnel syndrome therapy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Sinogram to image: direct reconstruction of photoacoustic tomography image using a hybrid deep learning approach.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- A water cushion improved needle visualization by artificial beam steering during ultrasound-guided in-plane technique: anQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- MSD-Net: Multi-scale dense convolutional neural network for photoacoustic image reconstruction with sparse data.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate needle guidance is crucial for safe and effective clinical diagnosis and treatment procedures. Conventional ultrasound (US)-guided needle insertion often encounters challenges in consistency and precisely visualizing the needle, necessitating the development of reliable methods to track the needle. As a powerful tool in image processing, deep learning has shown promise for enhancing needle visibility in US images, although its dependence on manual annotation or simulated data as ground truth can lead to potential bias or difficulties in generalizing to real US images. Photoacoustic (PA) imaging has demonstrated its capability for high-contrast needle visualization. In this study, we explore the potential of PA imaging as a reliable ground truth for deep learning network training without the need for expert annotation. Our network (UIU-Net), trained on ex vivo tissue image datasets, has shown remarkable precision in localizing needles within US images. The evaluation of needle segmentation performance extends across previously unseen ex vivo data and in vivo human data (collected from an open-source data repository). Specifically, for human data, the Modified Hausdorff Distance (MHD) value stands at approximately 3.73, and the targeting error value is around 2.03, indicating the strong similarity and small needle orientation deviation between the predicted needle and actual needle location. A key advantage of our method is its applicability beyond US images captured from specific imaging systems, extending to images from other US imaging systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.