Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38174089›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal2023

How origin of ovaries influences the vitrification outcome of bovine ovarian tissue: effects of side of ovaries and corpus luteum.

Mohammad Hamed Shahsavari, Gholamali Moghaddam, Kele Amaral Alves, Benner Geraldo Alves, Laritza Ferreira de Lima, Golshan Azimi, Deysi Juana Dipaz Berrocal, Luciana Mascena Silva, Yago Pinto da Silva, Diego Alberto Montano Vizcarra and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mohammad Hamed ShahsavariDepartment of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Gholamali MoghaddamDepartment of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Kele Amaral AlvesDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medicine College, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Benner Geraldo AlvesDepartment of Basic Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Preantral Follicles, State University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Laritza Ferreira de LimaDepartment of Basic Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Preantral Follicles, State University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Golshan AzimiDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
Deysi Juana Dipaz BerrocalDepartment of Basic Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Preantral Follicles, State University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Luciana Mascena SilvaDepartment of Basic Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Preantral Follicles, State University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Yago Pinto da SilvaDepartment of Basic Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Preantral Follicles, State University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Diego Alberto Montano VizcarraDepartment of Basic Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Preantral Follicles, State University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
José Ricardo de FigueiredoDepartment of Basic Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Preantral Follicles, State University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Ana Paula Ribeiro RodriguesDepartment of Basic Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Preantral Follicles, State University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although cryopreservation of ovarian tissue has advanced greatly, it remains a challenge, and protocols should be optimized to handle the heterogeneous nature of ovarian samples. In an effort to address this factor, the present study evaluated the effects of corpus luteum (CL) and side of ovaries (right versus left) on cellular morphology and viability of vitrified bovine ovarian fragments in a closed system. The ovaries were categorized according to whether they had a CL and which side they were on, and then divided into six groups: 1) CL+ (with CL) group; 2) CL- (without CL) group; 3) right ovaries group; 4) left ovaries group; 5) fresh control group (ovaries without vitrification or culture that were not selected for CL or ovarian side) and 6)

Indexed as

Corpus luteumCryopreservationImmunolocalizationOvarian tissueVitrification

Identifiers

PMID38174089
PMCPMC10759775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.