Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38174076›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Access and efficacy of university mental health services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Beverly Wagner, Yaser Snoubar, Yousif S Mahdi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Beverly WagnerSocial Work Department, Texas Woman's University, Denton, TX, United States.
Yaser SnoubarSocial Sciences Department, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Yousif S MahdiSocial Sciences Department, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study sought to understand the mental health issues, mental health support and efficacy of that support among university students. Participants: All students enrolled in a College of Arts and Sciences at one mid-size university received an email that contained a link to an anonymous, online questionnaire developed and disseminated through PsychData. 162 students completed the questionnaire. Methods: Mixed methods: Data was summarized using descriptive analysis, testing for significance, testing for differences, and content analysis. Results: Participants reported high levels of anxiety (76%) and depression (65%). Results indicated that participant demographics were associated with types of mental access, and support. Unexpected results included lack of knowledge or information on cost, and how to access mental health services hindered access for participants, and although telehealth was the most widely used support, in contrast to other studies, participants indicated a preference for face-to-face mental health services. Conclusion: Results highlight the need for improving communication about and access to mental health services in higher education Recommendations and implications for policy and support services are provided.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental Health ServicesHumansMental HealthPandemicsUniversitiesCOVID-19 pandemichigher education support servicesmental health accesstelehealthuniversity students

Identifiers

PMID38174076
PMCPMC10761424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.