Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38174035›Full record

ArticleImaging science in dentistry2023

Convolutional neural networks for automated tooth numbering on panoramic radiographs: A scoping review.

Ramadhan Hardani Putra, Eha Renwi Astuti, Aga Satria Nurrachman, Dina Karimah Putri, Ahmad Badruddin Ghazali, Tjio Andrinanti Pradini, Dhinda Tiara Prabaningtyas

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging science in dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ramadhan Hardani PutraDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0622-3892
Eha Renwi AstutiDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3815-9485
Aga Satria NurrachmanDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3788-8499
Dina Karimah PutriDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7183-9511
Ahmad Badruddin GhazaliOral Radiology Unit, Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Diagnosis, Kulliyyah of Dentistry, International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8399-3356
Tjio Andrinanti PradiniUndergraduate Program, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3633-6220
Dhinda Tiara PrabaningtyasUndergraduate Program, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4287-4253

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this scoping review was to investigate the applicability and performance of various convolutional neural network (CNN) models in tooth numbering on panoramic radiographs, achieved through classification, detection, and segmentation tasks. Material and Methods: An online search was performed of the PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus databases. Based on the selection process, 12 studies were included in this review. Results: Eleven studies utilized a CNN model for detection tasks, 5 for classification tasks, and 3 for segmentation tasks in the context of tooth numbering on panoramic radiographs. Most of these studies revealed high performance of various CNN models in automating tooth numbering. However, several studies also highlighted limitations of CNNs, such as the presence of false positives and false negatives in identifying decayed teeth, teeth with crown prosthetics, teeth adjacent to edentulous areas, dental implants, root remnants, wisdom teeth, and root canal-treated teeth. These limitations can be overcome by ensuring both the quality and quantity of datasets, as well as optimizing the CNN architecture. Conclusion: CNNs have demonstrated high performance in automated tooth numbering on panoramic radiographs. Future development of CNN-based models for this purpose should also consider different stages of dentition, such as the primary and mixed dentition stages, as well as the presence of various tooth conditions. Ultimately, an optimized CNN architecture can serve as the foundation for an automated tooth numbering system and for further artificial intelligence research on panoramic radiographs for a variety of purposes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningDentitionRadiography, PanoramicTechnology Transfer

Identifiers

PMID38174035
PMCPMC10761295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.