ReviewProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2024
A comprehensive analysis of different types of clinical rounds in hospital medicine.
Review in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rounding Styles on Inpatient Infectious Disease Consult Services: Impact on Education and Patient-Care Delivery.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Review
- A New Paradigm in Hospital Medicine: Evaluating the Effects of Geographical Cohorting on Health Care Delivery.HCA healthcare journal of medicine · 2025Review
- Exploring the Ramifications of Delayed Hospital Discharges: Impacts on Patients, Physicians, and Healthcare Systems.Cureus · 2024Review
- Delivering on our educational and clinical missions as teaching physicians.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Table rounds and bedside rounds are two methods healthcare professionals employ during clinical rounds for patient care and medical education. Bedside rounds involve direct patient engagement and physical examination, thus significantly impacting patient outcomes, such as improving communication and patient satisfaction. Table rounds occur in a conference room without the patient present and involve discussing patient data, which is more effective in fostering structured medical education. Both bedside and table rounds have pros and cons, and healthcare professionals should consider the specific requirements of their patients and medical trainees when deciding which approach to use. This research utilized a comprehensive search to identify relevant resources, such as university website links, as well as a PubMed search using relevant keywords such as 'bedside rounding,' 'table rounding,' and 'patient satisfaction.' Relevance, publication date, and study design were the basis for inclusion criteria. This study compared the effectiveness of these two methods based on physician communication, medical education, patient care, and patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.