Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38173986›Full record

ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2024

Improving referral rates for smoking cessation: A multifaceted intervention aimed at radiation oncologists.

Iris Bronsema, Luc van Lonkhuijzen, Peter Scholten, Janna Laan, Henrike Westerveld, Lukas Stalpers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Iris BronsemaDepartment of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Location AMCMeibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Luc van LonkhuijzenDepartment of Gynaecology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Peter ScholtenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Location AMCMeibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Janna LaanDepartment of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Location AMCMeibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Henrike WesterveldDepartment of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Location AMCMeibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lukas StalpersDepartment of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Location AMCMeibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Continuation of smoking after a cancer diagnosis increases the burdensome side effects from cancer treatment, and decreases the chances of cure. Smoking cessation may improve oncological outcomes in cancer patients. This study aims to evaluate if radiation oncologists can be motivated by a smoking cessation awareness intervention to discuss smoking status more frequently and increase the referral rate for smoking cessation-support.Study design and Setting:A multifaceted approach was used to improve awareness: First, current practice was evaluated by a retrospective chart review of 282 patients referred for radiotherapy to ascertain smoking status, discussion of smoking cessation support and referral rates. Secondly, radiation oncologists were interviewed about their motives and barriers to discuss smoking status and smoking cessation support. The results were fed back in a teaching lecture to the doctors involved. Finally, the effect of this smoking cessation awareness intervention was prospectively evaluated in 100 patients. Results: After the smoking cessation awareness intervention, smoking cessation was more frequently discussed compared to baseline (77% (10/13)) and 39.5% (17/43) respectively. The referral rate for smoking cessation increased from 2.3% (1/43) to 69.2% (9/13). Conclusion: Without an active smoking prevention awareness policy, referral for smoking cessation support for cancer patients by radiation oncologists is low. A relatively short and simple smoking awareness intervention for radiation oncologist may result in a more frequent discussion with patients about smoking cessation and an even larger increase in referrals for smoking cessation support.

Indexed as

CancerConsultationRadiotherapyReferralSmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID38173986
PMCPMC10761906
OpenAlexW4389000978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.