ArticleCrystal growth & design2023
Ab Initio Crystal Structure Prediction of the Energetic Materials LLM-105, RDX, and HMX.
Article in Crystal growth & design, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Crystal Structure Prediction for Aprotic Ionic Liquids - Searching for the Unknown.Crystal growth & design · 2026Article
- Exploring organic chemical space for materials discovery using crystal structure prediction-informed evolutionary optimisation.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Genarris 3.0: Generating Close-Packed Molecular Crystal Structures with Rigid Press.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Efficient Molecular Crystal Structure Prediction and Stability Assessment with AIMNet2 Neural Network Potentials.Crystal growth & design · 2025Article
- One Size Fits All? Development of the CPOSS209 Data Set of Experimental and Hypothetical Polymorphs for Testing Computational Modeling Methods.Crystal growth & design · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Prediction of Composite Materials Properties Based on Experimental Testing Data.Polymers · 2025Article
- The seventh blind test of crystal structure prediction: structure generation methods.Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials · 2024Article
- The seventh blind test of crystal structure prediction: structure ranking methods.Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials · 2024Article
- Crystal Structure Landscape of Diarylethene-Based Crystalline Solids: A Comprehensive CSD Analysis.Crystal growth & design · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crystal structure prediction (CSP) is performed for the energetic materials (EMs) LLM-105 and α-RDX, as well as the α and β conformational polymorphs of 1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetraazacyclooctane (HMX), using the genetic algorithm (GA) code, GAtor, and its associated random structure generator, Genarris. Genarris and GAtor successfully generate the experimental structures of all targets. GAtor's symmetric crossover scheme, where the space group symmetries of parent structures are treated as genes inherited by offspring, is found to be particularly effective. However, conducting several GA runs with different settings is still important for achieving diverse samplings of the potential energy surface. For LLM-105 and α-RDX, the experimental structure is ranked as the most stable, with all of the dispersion-inclusive density functional theory (DFT) methods used here. For HMX, the α form was persistently ranked as more stable than the β form, in contrast to experimental observations, even when correcting for vibrational contributions and thermal expansion. This may be attributed to insufficient accuracy of dispersion-inclusive DFT methods or to kinetic effects not considered here. In general, the ranking of some putative structures is found to be sensitive to the choice of the DFT functional and the dispersion method. For LLM-105, GAtor generates a putative structure with a layered packing motif, which is desirable thanks to its correlation with low sensitivity. Our results demonstrate that CSP is a useful tool for studying the ubiquitous polymorphism of EMs and shows promise of becoming an integral part of the EM development pipeline.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.