Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38173900›Full record

ArticleCrystal growth & design2023

Ab Initio Crystal Structure Prediction of the Energetic Materials LLM-105, RDX, and HMX.

Dana O'Connor, Imanuel Bier, Rithwik Tom, Anna M Hiszpanski, Brad A Steele, Noa Marom

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crystal growth & design, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The seventh blind test of crystal structure prediction: structure generation methods.Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials · 2024
    Article
  8. The seventh blind test of crystal structure prediction: structure ranking methods.Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dana O'ConnorDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.
Imanuel BierDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1084-770X
Rithwik TomDepartment of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.
Anna M HiszpanskiMaterials Science Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2705-3263
Brad A SteeleMaterials Science Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8703-024X
Noa MaromDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1508-1312
Carnegie Mellon University · USLawrence Livermore National Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crystal structure prediction (CSP) is performed for the energetic materials (EMs) LLM-105 and α-RDX, as well as the α and β conformational polymorphs of 1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetraazacyclooctane (HMX), using the genetic algorithm (GA) code, GAtor, and its associated random structure generator, Genarris. Genarris and GAtor successfully generate the experimental structures of all targets. GAtor's symmetric crossover scheme, where the space group symmetries of parent structures are treated as genes inherited by offspring, is found to be particularly effective. However, conducting several GA runs with different settings is still important for achieving diverse samplings of the potential energy surface. For LLM-105 and α-RDX, the experimental structure is ranked as the most stable, with all of the dispersion-inclusive density functional theory (DFT) methods used here. For HMX, the α form was persistently ranked as more stable than the β form, in contrast to experimental observations, even when correcting for vibrational contributions and thermal expansion. This may be attributed to insufficient accuracy of dispersion-inclusive DFT methods or to kinetic effects not considered here. In general, the ranking of some putative structures is found to be sensitive to the choice of the DFT functional and the dispersion method. For LLM-105, GAtor generates a putative structure with a layered packing motif, which is desirable thanks to its correlation with low sensitivity. Our results demonstrate that CSP is a useful tool for studying the ubiquitous polymorphism of EMs and shows promise of becoming an integral part of the EM development pipeline.

Identifiers

PMID38173900
PMCPMC10763925
OpenAlexW4385953935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.