Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38173835›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2023

The value of machine learning in preoperative identification of lymph node metastasis status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhonglian Ren, Banghong Chen, Changying Hong, Jiaying Yuan, Junying Deng, Yan Chen, Jionglin Ye, Yanqin Li

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhonglian RenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Shuangliu Distract Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Banghong ChenData Science R&D Center of Yanchang Technology, Chengdu, China.
Changying HongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Shuangliu Distract Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Jiaying YuanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Shuangliu Distract Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Junying DengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Shuangliu Distract Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Yan ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Shuangliu Distract Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Jionglin YeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Shuangliu Distract Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Yanqin LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Shuangliu Distract Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Sichuan Province · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The early identification of lymph node metastasis status in endometrial cancer (EC) is a serious challenge in clinical practice. Some investigators have introduced machine learning into the early identification of lymph node metastasis in EC patients. However, the predictive value of machine learning is controversial due to the diversity of models and modeling variables. To this end, we carried out this systematic review and meta-analysis to systematically discuss the value of machine learning for the early identification of lymph node metastasis in EC patients. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science until March 12, 2023. PROBAST was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. In the process of meta-analysis, subgroup analysis was performed according to modeling variables (clinical features, radiomic features, and radiomic features combined with clinical features) and different types of models in various variables. Results: This systematic review included 50 primary studies with a total of 103,752 EC patients, 12,579 of whom had positive lymph node metastasis. Meta-analysis showed that among the machine learning models constructed by the three categories of modeling variables, the best model was constructed by combining radiomic features with clinical features, with a pooled c-index of 0.907 (95%CI: 0.886-0.928) in the training set and 0.823 (95%CI: 0.757-0.890) in the validation set, and good sensitivity and specificity. The c-index of the machine learning model constructed based on clinical features alone was not inferior to that based on radiomic features only. In addition, logistic regression was found to be the main modeling method and has ideal predictive performance with different categories of modeling variables. Conclusion: Although the model based on radiomic features combined with clinical features has the best predictive efficiency, there is no recognized specification for the application of radiomics at present. In addition, the logistic regression constructed by clinical features shows good sensitivity and specificity. In this context, large-sample studies covering different races are warranted to develop predictive nomograms based on clinical features, which can be widely applied in clinical practice. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023420774.

Indexed as

endometrial cancerlymph node metastasismachine learningradiomicssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38173835
PMCPMC10761539
OpenAlexW4390007151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.