Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38173830›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2024

Learning curve in the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure: An analysis of the first 171 cases.

A A Vetoshkin, K D Mikhaylova

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07457931 (ESTABLE), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07457931 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

ESTABLE: A Randomized Control Trial of Shoulder Instability Using the Latarjet Procedure With Suture Tape Cerclage Versus Screw Fixation

TypeinterventionalSponsorJuan AmeztoyRan2026 to 2027Enrolled80ConditionsShoulder Instability, Shoulder, Latarjet, Anterior Shoulder InstabilityArmsMetal screw fixation of the coracoid graft during the Latarjet procedure., High-strength suture tape cerclage fixation of the coracoid graft during the Latarjet procedure.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A A VetoshkinTraumatology and Orthopedics Department, Nikiforov Russian Center of Emergency and Radiation Medicine, EMERCOM of Russia, 4/2, Academica Lebedeva Str., St. Petersburg, 194044, Russia.
K D MikhaylovaTraumatology and Orthopedics Department, Nikiforov Russian Center of Emergency and Radiation Medicine, EMERCOM of Russia, 4/2, Academica Lebedeva Str., St. Petersburg, 194044, Russia.
Ministry of Emergency Situations · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure is accepted as effective and safe. However, it is more likely to be challenging in execution. Therefore, the analysis of the learning curve remains to be worth examination. Objective: To examine the learning curve in the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure through an analysis of the correlation between the average operative time, complications rate, and the total number of performed surgeries and execution frequency. Materials and method: A total of 171 patients who underwent arthroscopic Latarjet surgery between 2013 and 2020 were included. Clinical findings were recorded postoperatively. We fixed the operative time with account taken of the execution frequency and the number of intra- and postoperative complications. All procedures were completed by one surgeon. Results: By statistical analysis, a significant association between the operative time and the number of surgical interventions was found (p < 0.05). After 120 procedures, the average operative time demonstrated a constant reduction and reached 62.8 min (p < 0.05). We detected the relation between the average operative time and surgery frequency. The significant correlation between the number of intraoperative complications and the number of procedures performed manifests after the 20th surgery (p < 0.05). In total, 13 episodes of complications were recorded (7.6 %). 9 cases of intraoperative complications (5.3 %) conversed into the open Latarjet procedure. 4 episodes of postoperative complications (2.3 %) were documented, among them 2 hematomas which were treated conservatively, and 2 cases of recurrent shoulder instability. There were no neurological, neurovascular, and infection complications seen in our cohort. Discussion: It took more than 120 arthroscopic procedures to reach the stable and reproducible indices in operative time, and more than 20 surgeries to achieve a significant reduction in the intraoperative complications rate. There was no correlation between the postoperative complication rate and the number of performed procedures. The overall level of complications did not exceed the level mentioned in the literature. The high surgical activity could be considered as a favorable factor to increase the efficiency of the learning process. Conclusion: Gaining clinical experience with the passing of the learning stages impacts significantly the rate of intraoperative complications and operative time. The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure is safe and characterized with good clinical results even within the initial stages of the learning curve.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyLatarjet procedureLearning curveShoulder instabilityShoulder surgerySurgeon experience

Identifiers

PMID38173830
PMCPMC10758696
OpenAlexW4389210139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.