ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis
Two Cases of Emergency Tracheostomy After Head and Neck Photoimmunotherapy.
Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted near-infrared photoimmunotherapy for epidermal growth factor receptor-expressing advanced solid tumors: a scoping review of barriers and enablers to clinical translation.Antibody therapeutics · 2026Review
- Impact of Vitamin C on Immune Response and Edema Following Near-Infrared Photoimmunotherapy (NIR-PIT).Cancer science · 2025Article
- Next-Generation Cancer Treatment: Photoimmunotherapy's Promise for Unresectable Head and Neck Cancers.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Article
- Real-Time Fluorescence Monitoring System for Optimal Light Dosage in Cancer Photoimmunotherapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Pain Associated With Head and Neck Cancer Photoimmunotherapy.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aim: Head and neck photoimmuno-therapy (HN-PIT) has been an insured treatment in Japan for approximately three years. The number of treatments has gradually increased to over 350 cases. However, there are still various questions in actual clinical practice, including laryngeal edema. Therefore, it is vital to carefully explain in advance to patients the possibility of laryngeal edema occurring and obtaining consent for tracheostomy as a prophylactic or emergency measure. At our institution, 44 HN-PIT cycles were performed in 23 patients between January 2021 and October 2023. Of these, we experienced two cases in which preventive tracheostomy was not performed because the risk of laryngeal edema was considered low; however, laryngeal edema developed after treatment, and an emergency tracheostomy had to be performed. Case Report: Case 1 was a patient in his 70s with a local recurrence of mandibular gingival carcinoma. HN-PIT using cylindrical diffusers was performed on the target lesion, extending from the lateral wall of the oropharynx to the soft palate. Case 2 was also a patient in his 70s with carcinoma of the mid-pharynx. HN-PIT was performed using a frontal diffuser to target lesions extending from the soft palate to the buccal mucosa. Notably, both patients developed laryngeal edema after HN-PIT, and an emergency tracheostomy had to be performed. Conclusion: HN-PIT treatment is still being established through a trial-and-error method and is still incomplete.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.