MRI-based interpretable radiomics nomogram for discrimination between Brucella spondylitis and Pyogenic spondylitis.

Background: Pyogenic spondylitis (PS) and Brucella spondylitis (BS) are commonly seen spinal infectious diseases. Both types can lead to vertebral destruction, kyphosis, and long-term neurological deficits if not promptly diagnosed and treated. Therefore, accurately diagnosis is crucial for personalized therapy. Distinguishing between PS and BS in everyday clinical settings is challenging due to the similarity of their clinical symptoms and imaging features. Hence, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a radiomics nomogram using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to accurately differentiate between the two types of spondylitis. Methods: Clinical and MRI data from 133 patients (2017-2022) with pathologically confirmed PS and BS (68 and 65 patients, respectively) were collected. We have divided patients into training and testing cohorts. In order to develop a clinical diagnostic model, logistic regression was utilized to fit a conventional clinical model (M1). Radiomics features were extracted from sagittal fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging (FS-T2WI) sequence. The radiomics features were preprocessed, including scaling using Z-score and undergoing univariate analysis to eliminate redundant features. Furthermore, the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) was employed to develop a radiomics score (M2). A composite model (M3) was created by combining M1 and M2. Subsequently, calibration and decision curves were generated to evaluate the nomogram's performance in both training and testing groups. The diagnostic performance of each model and the indication was assessed using the receiver operating curve (ROC) with its area under the curve (AUC). Finally, we used the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) model explanations technique to interpret the model result. Results: We have finally selected 9 significant features from sagittal FS-T2WI sequences. In the differential diagnosis of PS and BS, the AUC values of M1, M2, and M3 in the testing set were 0.795, 0.859, and 0.868. The composite model exhibited a high degree of concurrence with the ideal outcomes, as evidenced by the calibration curves. The nomogram's possible clinical application values were indicated by the decision curve analysis. By using SHAP values to represent prediction outcomes, our model's prediction results are more understandable. Conclusions: The implementation of a nomogram that integrates MRI and clinical data has the potential to significantly enhance the accuracy of discriminating between PS and BS within clinical settings.