SynthesisJournal of biosciences2024
Identification of biomarker genes from multiple studies for abiotic stress in maize through machine learning.
Synthesis in Journal of biosciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metagenomic Tools as Predictive Approaches to Decipher Soil and Rhizosphere Microbial Communities and Their Functions for Sustainable Agriculture.International journal of genomics · 2026Review
- Predictive prioritization of genes significantly associated with biotic and abiotic stresses in maize using machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abiotic stresses are major limiting factors for maize growth. Therefore, exploration of the mechanisms underlying the response to abiotic stress in maize is of great interest. Toward this end, we performed integration of the feature selection method into the meta-analysis of microarray gene expression. Following extraction of raw data, normalization, and batch effect removal, the data were merged into one expression profile. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between control and abiotic conditions were used for the feature selection algorithm to find the minimum features for high-performance classification. Feature selection was performed using a correlation-based feature selection (CFS) algorithm, considering features with a coefficient of 0.7 to 1. Different algorithms of Bayes, Functions, Lazy, Meta, Rules, and Trees were then tested in order to classify the samples and find the best performance classifier in each group. Moreover, the biological pathways and promoter motif analysis of selected genes were identified. The superior and overall performance of classification using all features (DEGs) were 98.86% (Multilayer Perceptron) and 81.25%, respectively. Classification based on feature selection resulted in an average accuracy of 94.69% and 93.56% with 33 and 12 features, respectively. Subsequently, gene ontology and promoter analysis were performed for the 12 selected biomarker genes. Five of them were downregulated and 7 were upregulated. ABRE, unnamed-1, G-box, and G-Box are motifs related to genes involved in several abiotic stress responses and are located upstream of at least nine probes in our study. This study revealed key genes associated with tolerance to abiotic stress in maize.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38173311W4389817672What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.