ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2024
InterDILI: interpretable prediction of drug-induced liver injury through permutation feature importance and attention mechanism.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning-Based Models to Predict Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) to Assist Medicinal Chemistry.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Generative pretraining for drug molecule design with bidirectional structure-property optimization.Communications chemistry · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in hepatopathy diagnosis and treatment: Big data analytics, deep learning, and clinical prediction models.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- MetaboGNN: predicting liver metabolic stability with graph neural networks and cross-species data.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Computational toxicology in drug discovery: applications of artificial intelligence in ADMET and toxicity prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- A multi-dimensional computational framework of drug-induced hepatotoxicity: integrating molecular structure features with disease pathogenesis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Impact of halogenation on scaffold toxicity assessed using HD-GEM machine learning model.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Drug Toxicity Prediction: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Toxics · 2025Review
- Refining Drug-Induced Cholestasis Prediction: An Explainable Consensus Model Integrating Chemical and Biological Fingerprints.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- HepatoToxicity Portal (HTP): an integrated database of drug-induced hepatotoxicity knowledgebase and graph neural network-based prediction model.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Article
- Machine Learning-Enabled Drug-Induced Toxicity Prediction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Drug Research.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Review
- Recent advances in AI-based toxicity prediction for drug discovery.Frontiers in chemistry · 2025Review
- iDILI-MT: identifying drug-induced liver injury compounds with a multi-head Transformer.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Prediction Models for the Capping and Breaking Force of Tablets Using Machine Learning Tools in Wet Granulation Commercial-Scale Pharmaceutical Manufacturing.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Safety is one of the important factors constraining the distribution of clinical drugs on the market. Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is the leading cause of safety problems produced by drug side effects. Therefore, the DILI risk of approved drugs and potential drug candidates should be assessed. Currently, in vivo and in vitro methods are used to test DILI risk, but both methods are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and expensive. To overcome these problems, many in silico methods for DILI prediction have been suggested. Previous studies have shown that DILI prediction models can be utilized as prescreening tools, and they achieved a good performance. However, there are still limitations in interpreting the prediction results. Therefore, this study focused on interpreting the model prediction to analyze which features could potentially cause DILI. For this, five publicly available datasets were collected to train and test the model. Then, various machine learning methods were applied using substructure and physicochemical descriptors as inputs and the DILI label as the output. The interpretation of feature importance was analyzed by recognizing the following general-to-specific patterns: (i) identifying general important features of the overall DILI predictions, and (ii) highlighting specific molecular substructures which were highly related to the DILI prediction for each compound. The results indicated that the model not only captured the previously known properties to be related to DILI but also proposed a new DILI potential substructural of physicochemical properties. The models for the DILI prediction achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.88-0.97 and an area under the Precision-Recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.81-0.95. From this, we hope the proposed models can help identify the potential DILI risk of drug candidates at an early stage and offer valuable insights for drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.