Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38173028›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2024

Circulating inflammatory biomarkers and risk of intracranial aneurysm: a Mendelian randomization study.

Jianxun Fang, Yuze Cao, Jun Ni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mendelian randomization studies on cardiometabolic factors and intracranial aneurysms: A systematic literature analysis.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jianxun FangDepartment of Neurology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No 1, Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yuze CaoDepartment of Neurology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No 1, Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Jun NiDepartment of Neurology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No 1, Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. pumchnijun@163.com.
Peking Union Medical College Hospital · CN

Funding

National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2022-PUMCH-D-007STI2030-Major Project #2021ZD0201100 Task 5 #2021ZD0201105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntracranial aneurysm (IA) accounts for a substantial source of non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, with inflammation postulated as a potential factor in its pathogenesis. The present study aims at evaluating the association between circulating inflammatory cytokines and risk of IA under a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) design.

methodsFor primary analysis, summary statistics of inflammatory regulators was obtained from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) comprising 8293 Finnish participants. Summary data of IA were extracted from a GWAS which comprised 7495 cases and 71,934 controls in European descent. For targeted analysis, summary statistics were extracted from two proteomic studies, which recruit 3301 and 5368 European participants, respectively. Summary data of IA were acquired from FinnGen study with 5342 cases and 342,673 controls. We employed inverse variance weighted (IVW) method as main approach, with sensitivity analyses using weighted median, MR-Egger, and MR-PRESSO methods. Reverse MR analyses were conducted to minimize bias from reverse causality.

resultsNo causation of cytokines with IA subtypes was identified in both primary and targeted analysis after Bonferroni correction. In primary analysis, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and fibroblast growth factor basic (bFGF) levels were suggestively associated with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) [VEGF → aSAH: OR = 1.15, 95%CI  1.04-1.26, P = 0.005; bFGF → aSAH: OR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.42-0.92, P = 0.02]. Statistical significance failed to replicate in targeted analysis. Instead, suggestive protective effects for aSAH were identified in FGF-9 (FGF-9 → aSAH: OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.89, P = 0.001) and FGF-16 (FGF-16 → aSAH: OR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.97, P = 0.017). Furthermore, reverse analyses identified suggestive effect of unruptured IA on RANTES, MIF, GRO-alpha, FGF-16, and FGF-19. Result remained robust after applying sensitivity tests.

conclusionsNo causality of inflammatory biomarkers on the risk of IA subtypes was identified. Future large-scale studies are in need to evaluate the temporal dynamics of cytokines in conjunction with IA.

Indexed as

Intracranial AneurysmBiomarkersCytokinesGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMendelian Randomization AnalysisProteomicsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ABiomarkersCytokinesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ACytokinesInflammationIntracranial aneurysmMendelian randomization

Identifiers

PMID38173028
PMCPMC10763118
OpenAlexW4390538967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.