ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2024
Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of 28-day mortality in ICU patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy: development and validation.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epicardial and pericardial adipose tissue: anatomy, physiology, imaging, segmentation, and treatment effects.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model to Predict Mortality in Patients With Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy: Multicenter Cohort Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Models for Mortality and Outcome Prediction in Intensive Care Unit Sepsis: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Management and Prediction of Acute Pancreatitis Severity Using AI: A Surgical Perspective.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Association between red blood cell distribution width-platelet ratio and mortality in patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy from the MIMIC-IV database: a retrospective cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning for early prediction of sepsis-induced coagulopathy: a multicenter retrospective development and validation study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting the 28-day mortality risk in patients with sepsis complicated by acute respiratory failure in the ICU.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- Cross-algorithm machine learning and consensus features for early disseminated intravascular coagulation risk prediction in sepsis-induced coagulopathy.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning model for predicting short-term outcomes in sepsis- induced coagulopathy.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning model for predicting traumatic brain injury-induced coagulopathy in elderly patients: A multicenter cohort study.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Neonatal Sepsis as Organ Dysfunction: Prognostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of the nSOFA in the NICU-A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for improving decision-making in bacterial infection management: a narrative review.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2026Review
- The prognostic value of red cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio for 28-day mortality in sepsis patients: a multicenter analysis based on the eICU Collaborative Research Database.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Predictive modeling for mortality risk in elderly patients with pulmonary embolism using machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Identification and Experimental Verification Reveal SLC2A3 Associated With Prognosis and Immune Infiltration in Colon Adenocarcinoma.Mediators of inflammation · 2026Article
- Optimization of glucocorticoid administration in patients with sepsis using reinforcement learning: a multicenter retrospective study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Advances in rhabdomyolysis: A review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2026Review
- Progress in sepsis prediction models: from traditional scoring systems to multimodal intelligence and clinical translation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Using Interpretable Machine Learning with SHAP to Assess Dynapenic Abdominal Obesity as a Stroke Risk Predictor: A Prospective Cohort Study.Vascular health and risk management · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Codes in AI Prediction Models and Label Leakage of Same-Admission Clinical Outcomes.JAMA network open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) is extremely common in individuals with sepsis, significantly associated with poor outcomes. This study attempted to develop an interpretable and generalizable machine learning (ML) model for early predicting the risk of 28-day death in patients with SIC.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we extracted SIC patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III), MIMIC-IV, and eICU-CRD database according to Toshiaki Iba's scale. And the overlapping in the MIMIC-IV was excluded for this study. Afterward, only the MIMIC-III cohort was randomly divided into the training set, and the internal validation set according to the ratio of 7:3, while the MIMIC-IV and eICU-CRD databases were considered the external validation sets. The predictive factors for 28-day mortality of SIC patients were determined using recursive feature elimination combined with tenfold cross-validation (RFECV). Then, we constructed models using ML algorithms. Multiple metrics were used for evaluation of performance of the models, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, recall, and F1 score. Finally, Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) were employed to provide a reasonable interpretation for the prediction results.
resultsA total of 3280, 2798, and 1668 SIC patients were screened from MIMIC-III, MIMIC-IV, and eICU-CRD databases, respectively. Seventeen features were selected to construct ML prediction models. XGBoost had the best performance in predicting the 28-day mortality of SIC patients, with AUC of 0.828, 0.913 and 0.923, the AUPRC of 0.807, 0.796 and 0.921, the accuracy of 0.785, 0.885 and 0.891, the F
conclusionsWe developed an optimal and explainable ML model to predict the risk of 28-day death of SIC patients 28-day death risk. Compared with conventional scoring systems, the XGBoost model performed better. The model established will have the potential to improve the level of clinical practice for SIC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.