Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38172962›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2024

Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of 28-day mortality in ICU patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy: development and validation.

Shu Zhou, Zongqing Lu, Yu Liu, Minjie Wang, Wuming Zhou, Xuanxuan Cui, Jin Zhang, Wenyan Xiao, Tianfeng Hua, Huaqing Zhu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Advances in rhabdomyolysis: A review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shu Zhou *Emergency Internal Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Zongqing Lu *The 2nd Department of Intensive Care Unit, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Yu LiuKey Laboratory of Intelligent Computing and Signal Processing, Anhui University, Ministry of Education, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Minjie WangThe 2nd Department of Intensive Care Unit, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Wuming ZhouThe 2nd Department of Intensive Care Unit, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Xuanxuan CuiThe 2nd Department of Intensive Care Unit, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Jin ZhangThe 2nd Department of Intensive Care Unit, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Wenyan XiaoThe 2nd Department of Intensive Care Unit, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Tianfeng HuaThe 2nd Department of Intensive Care Unit, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Huaqing ZhuLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Department of Biochemistry, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, Anhui, People's Republic of China. aydzhq@126.com.
Min YangThe 2nd Department of Intensive Care Unit, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, People's Republic of China. yangmin@ahmu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82072134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) is extremely common in individuals with sepsis, significantly associated with poor outcomes. This study attempted to develop an interpretable and generalizable machine learning (ML) model for early predicting the risk of 28-day death in patients with SIC.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we extracted SIC patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III), MIMIC-IV, and eICU-CRD database according to Toshiaki Iba's scale. And the overlapping in the MIMIC-IV was excluded for this study. Afterward, only the MIMIC-III cohort was randomly divided into the training set, and the internal validation set according to the ratio of 7:3, while the MIMIC-IV and eICU-CRD databases were considered the external validation sets. The predictive factors for 28-day mortality of SIC patients were determined using recursive feature elimination combined with tenfold cross-validation (RFECV). Then, we constructed models using ML algorithms. Multiple metrics were used for evaluation of performance of the models, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, recall, and F1 score. Finally, Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) were employed to provide a reasonable interpretation for the prediction results.

resultsA total of 3280, 2798, and 1668 SIC patients were screened from MIMIC-III, MIMIC-IV, and eICU-CRD databases, respectively. Seventeen features were selected to construct ML prediction models. XGBoost had the best performance in predicting the 28-day mortality of SIC patients, with AUC of 0.828, 0.913 and 0.923, the AUPRC of 0.807, 0.796 and 0.921, the accuracy of 0.785, 0.885 and 0.891, the F

conclusionsWe developed an optimal and explainable ML model to predict the risk of 28-day death of SIC patients 28-day death risk. Compared with conventional scoring systems, the XGBoost model performed better. The model established will have the potential to improve the level of clinical practice for SIC patients.

Indexed as

Blood Coagulation DisordersSepsisAlgorithmsHumansIntensive Care UnitsMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesGradient boosting decision treeLocal interpretable model-agnostic explanationsMachine learningSepsis induced coagulopathyShapley additive explanations

Identifiers

PMID38172962
PMCPMC10763177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.