Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38172924›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2024

A novel in-situ-process technique constructs whole circular cpDNA library.

Qiang Zhou, Xianlong Ding, Hongjie Wang, Zunaira Farooq, Liang Wang, Shouping Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiang ZhouKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetics Improvement of Soybean, Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory (ZSBBL), National Innovation Platform for Soybean Breeding and Industry-Education Integration, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, National Center for Soybean Improvement, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Soybean Research Institute, College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Xianlong DingKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetics Improvement of Soybean, Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory (ZSBBL), National Innovation Platform for Soybean Breeding and Industry-Education Integration, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, National Center for Soybean Improvement, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Soybean Research Institute, College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Hongjie WangKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetics Improvement of Soybean, Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory (ZSBBL), National Innovation Platform for Soybean Breeding and Industry-Education Integration, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, National Center for Soybean Improvement, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Soybean Research Institute, College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Zunaira FarooqKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetics Improvement of Soybean, Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory (ZSBBL), National Innovation Platform for Soybean Breeding and Industry-Education Integration, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, National Center for Soybean Improvement, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Soybean Research Institute, College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Liang WangKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetics Improvement of Soybean, Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory (ZSBBL), National Innovation Platform for Soybean Breeding and Industry-Education Integration, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, National Center for Soybean Improvement, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Soybean Research Institute, College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Shouping YangKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetics Improvement of Soybean, Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China, Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory (ZSBBL), National Innovation Platform for Soybean Breeding and Industry-Education Integration, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, National Center for Soybean Improvement, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Soybean Research Institute, College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China. spyang@njau.edu.cn.
Nanjing Agricultural University · CN

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2016YFD0101500National Key R&D Program of China 2016YFD0101504National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFF1003500National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFF1003504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe chloroplast genome (cp genome) is directly related to the study and analysis of molecular phylogeny and evolution of plants in the phylogenomics era. The cp genome, whereas, is highly plastic and exists as a heterogeneous mixture of sizes and physical conformations. It is advantageous to purify/enrich the circular chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) to reduce sequence complexity in cp genome research. Large-insert, ordered DNA libraries are more practical for genomics research than conventional, unordered ones. From this, a technique of constructing the ordered BAC library with the goal-insert cpDNA fragment is developed in this paper.

resultsThis novel in-situ-process technique will efficiently extract circular cpDNA from crops and construct a high-quality cpDNA library. The protocol combines the in-situ chloroplast lysis for the high-purity circular cpDNA with the in-situ substitute/ligation for the high-quality cpDNA library. Individually, a series of original buffers/solutions and optimized procedures for chloroplast lysis in-situ is different than bacterial lysis in-situ; the in-situ substitute/ligation that reacts on the MCE membrane is suitable for constructing the goal-insert, ordered cpDNA library while preventing the large-insert cpDNA fragment breakage. The goal-insert, ordered cpDNA library is arrayed on the microtiter plate by three colonies with the definite cpDNA fragment that are homologous-corresponds to the whole circular cpDNA of the chloroplast.

conclusionThe novel in-situ-process technique amply furtherance of research in genome-wide functional analysis and characterization of chloroplasts, such as genome sequencing, bioinformatics analysis, cloning, physical mapping, molecular phylogeny and evolution.

Indexed as

BAC libraryChloroplastCircular cpDNAIn-situ lysisIn-situ-processIn-situ substitute/ligation

Identifiers

PMID38172924
PMCPMC10763311
OpenAlexW4390539374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.