Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38172915›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2024

Identification of a Notch transcriptomic signature for breast cancer.

Eike-Benjamin Braune, Felix Geist, Xiaojia Tang, Krishna Kalari, Judy Boughey, Liewei Wang, Roberto A Leon-Ferre, Antonino B D'Assoro, James N Ingle, Matthew P Goetz and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular Basis of Breast Tumor Heterogeneity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. IncreasedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Eike-Benjamin Braune *Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Felix Geist *Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Xiaojia TangDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Krishna KalariDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Judy BougheyDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Liewei WangDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Roberto A Leon-FerreDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Antonino B D'AssoroDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
James N IngleDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Matthew P GoetzDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Julian KreisMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Kang WangDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Theodoros FoukakisDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anita SeshireMerck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Dirk WienkeMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Urban LendahlDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. urban.lendahl@ki.se.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USKarolinska Institutet · SEMerck (Germany) · DEMayo Clinic in Florida · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDysregulated Notch signalling contributes to breast cancer development and progression, but validated tools to measure the level of Notch signalling in breast cancer subtypes and in response to systemic therapy are largely lacking. A transcriptomic signature of Notch signalling would be warranted, for example to monitor the effects of future Notch-targeting therapies and to learn whether altered Notch signalling is an off-target effect of current breast cancer therapies. In this report, we have established such a classifier.

methodsTo generate the signature, we first identified Notch-regulated genes from six basal-like breast cancer cell lines subjected to elevated or reduced Notch signalling by culturing on immobilized Notch ligand Jagged1 or blockade of Notch by γ-secretase inhibitors, respectively. From this cadre of Notch-regulated genes, we developed candidate transcriptomic signatures that were trained on a breast cancer patient dataset (the TCGA-BRCA cohort) and a broader breast cancer cell line cohort and sought to validate in independent datasets.

resultsAn optimal 20-gene transcriptomic signature was selected. We validated the signature on two independent patient datasets (METABRIC and Oslo2), and it showed an improved coherence score and tumour specificity compared with previously published signatures. Furthermore, the signature score was particularly high for basal-like breast cancer, indicating an enhanced level of Notch signalling in this subtype. The signature score was increased after neoadjuvant treatment in the PROMIX and BEAUTY patient cohorts, and a lower signature score generally correlated with better clinical outcome.

conclusionsThe 20-gene transcriptional signature will be a valuable tool to evaluate the response of future Notch-targeting therapies for breast cancer, to learn about potential effects on Notch signalling from conventional breast cancer therapies and to better stratify patients for therapy considerations.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansTranscriptomeBasal-likeBreast cancerBreast cancer stem cellDiagnosticsNotch signallingTherapyTherapy resistanceTranscriptomic signatureTriple-negative

Identifiers

PMID38172915
PMCPMC10765899
OpenAlexW4390546103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.