Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38172914›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2024

Culturally appropriate consent processes for community-driven indigenous child health research: a scoping review.

Cindy Peltier, Sarah Dickson, Viviane Grandpierre, Irina Oltean, Lorrilee McGregor, Emilie Hageltorn, Nancy L Young

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Cindy PeltierSchulich School of Education, Nipissing University, North Bay, ON, Canada. cindyp@nipissingu.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-9001-4980
Sarah DicksonChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2711-971X
Viviane GrandpierreChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Irina OlteanDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Lorrilee McGregorNorthern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7459-7263
Emilie HageltornChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Nancy L YoungChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1739-3299
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario · CAImpact · CANipissing University · CANOSM University · CAUniversity of New Brunswick · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

CIHR 168023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent requirements for ethical research in Canada, specifically the standard of active or signed parental consent, can leave Indigenous children and youth with inequitable access to research opportunities or health screening. Our objective was to examine the literature to identify culturally safe research consent processes that respect the rights of Indigenous children, the rights and responsibilities of parents or caregivers, and community protocols.

methodsWe followed PRISMA guidelines and Arksey and O'Malley's approach for charting and synthesizing evidence. We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Informit Indigenous Collection, Bibliography of Native North Americans, and Sociological Abstracts. We included peer-reviewed primary and theoretical research articles written in English from January 1, 2000, to March 31, 2022, examining Indigenous approaches for obtaining informed consent from parents, families, children, or youth. Eligible records were uploaded to Covidence for title and abstract screening. We appraised the findings using a Two-Eyed Seeing approach. These findings were inductively coded using NVivo 12 and analyzed thematically.

resultsWe identified 2,984 records and 11 eligible studies were included after screening. Three key recommendations emerged: addressing tensions in the ethics of consent, embracing wise practices, and using relational approaches to consent. Tensions in consent concerned Research Ethics Board consent requirements that fall short of protecting Indigenous children and communities when culturally incongruent. Wise practices included allowing parents and children to consent together, land-based consenting, and involving communities in decision-making. Using relational approaches to consent embodied community engagement and relationship building while acknowledging consent for Indigenous children cannot be obtained in isolation from family and community.

conclusionsVery few studies discussed obtaining child consent in Indigenous communities. While Indigenous communities are not a monolith, the literature identified a need for community-driven, decolonized consent processes prioritizing Indigenous values and protocols. Further research is needed to examine nuances of Indigenized consent processes and determine how to operationalize them, enabling culturally appropriate, equitable access to research and services for all Indigenous children.

Indexed as

Child HealthResearchAdolescentCanadaChildEthics, ResearchHumansParental ConsentParentsAdolescentChildEthics, researchHealth disparate, minority and vulnerable populationsIndigenous peoplesMinorsParental consent

Identifiers

PMID38172914
PMCPMC10765721
OpenAlexW4390571914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.