Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38172900›Full record

Trial reportJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024

Effectiveness of focused extracorporeal shock wave versus manual therapy in postpartum patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a prospective clinical trial.

Kuai-Ling Tan, Rong Wang, Jiao-Jiao Liu, Yue Peng, Huan Li, Cui-Ying Li

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [Shockwave therapy for low back pain].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kuai-Ling TanPelvic Floor and Postpartum Rehabilitation Center, Changsha Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Chengnan Dong Lu, Yuhua District, Changsha, 410007, Hunan, China.
Rong WangDepartment of Gynecology II, Changsha Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, 410007, Hunan, China.
Jiao-Jiao LiuPelvic Floor and Postpartum Rehabilitation Center, Changsha Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Chengnan Dong Lu, Yuhua District, Changsha, 410007, Hunan, China.
Yue PengPelvic Floor and Postpartum Rehabilitation Center, Changsha Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Chengnan Dong Lu, Yuhua District, Changsha, 410007, Hunan, China.
Huan LiProduct R&D, Shenzhen Creative Industry Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, 518055, Guangdong, China.
Cui-Ying LiPelvic Floor and Postpartum Rehabilitation Center, Changsha Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Chengnan Dong Lu, Yuhua District, Changsha, 410007, Hunan, China. 15576619540@163.com.
Changsha Hospital for Maternal and Child Health Care · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy (FESWT) in treating postpartum sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction.

methodsA total of 90 patients with SIJ dysfunction were included and randomly assigned to FESWT, manual therapy (MT), or combination therapy (CT) groups. Pain intensity and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score were measured upon admission, after 1 and 2 weeks of treatments. The treatment efficacy and adverse events of each group were also assessed.

resultsThere were no significant differences among three groups regarding clinical data, pain intensity, and ODI score on admission (all P > 0.05). After 1 week of treatment, FESWT exhibited similar pain intensity and lower ODI score (P < 0.001) compared to MT. After 2 weeks of treatment, the pain and ODI in FESWT were similar with MT. The pain in CT was lower than MT after 1 week, but lower than FESWT after 2 weeks. Furthermore, we identified interaction effects between treatment method and duration in relation to pain intensity (F

conclusionsCompared to MT, FESWT mainly reduced the ODI score rather than pain after 1 week of treatment. After 2 weeks, the effect of FESWT in relieving the pain was inferior to the MT.

Indexed as

Joint DiseasesLow Back PainMusculoskeletal ManipulationsFemaleHumansProspective StudiesSacroiliac JointTreatment OutcomeFocused extracorporeal shockOswestry disability index scorePainSacroiliac joint dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID38172900
PMCPMC10763479
OpenAlexW4390547182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.