ArticleBMC urology2024
Type 2 diabetes mellitus increases the risk of circumcision among men aged between 30 and 69 years using a nationwide population-based dataset in Taiwan: a five-year follow-up study.
Article in BMC urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Empagliflozin Versus Dapagliflozin and Urogenital Adverse Events in Type 2 Diabetes: A Target Trial Emulation.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetes is an important factor in the development of penile inflammation. We studied whether type 2 diabetes (DM), with/without hypertension and hyperlipidemia increased the risk of circumcision among men aged between 30 and 69 using a population-based dataset in Taiwan during a 5-year follow-up period.
methodsThe research data in this study were obtained from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database between 1997 and 2010. We identified 23,197 patients who had a new diagnosis of DM and randomly matched 115,985 subjects as controls. We observed whether circumcision was the treatment after a new DM diagnosis. The initial step involved analyzing the data using Poisson regression analysis. To address potential confounding factors, this study employed propensity score matching based on three variables. Additionally, a Cox regression with a Gamma frailty was utilized to compare outcomes between different groups.
resultsPoisson regression analysis showed that DM (RR = 1.75, 95CI = 0.10 ~ 1.22), but not hypertension (RR = 1.14, 95CI=-0.44 ~ 0.70), hyperlipidemia (RR = 0.94, 95CI=-0.66 ~ 0.53), or age (RR = 0.83, 95CI=-0.43 ~ 0.62), had an impact on circumcision treatment. Cox regression with a frailty model found that DM was a risk factor associated with circumcision (HR = 2.31, 95% CI = 1.74 ~ 3.06, p-value < 0.01), whereas no significant difference was noted between circumcision and hypertension (HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.80 ~ 1.51), hyperlipidemia (HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.79 ~ 1.40), or age (HR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.99 ~ 1.02).
conclusionsType 2 diabetes mellitus, but not hypertension, hyperlipidemia or age increases the risk of circumcision in men aged between 30 and 69 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.