Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38172816›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2024

Predicting stone composition via machine-learning models trained on intra-operative endoscopic digital images.

Guanhua Zhu, Chengbai Li, Yinsheng Guo, Lu Sun, Tao Jin, Ziyue Wang, Shiqing Li, Feng Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guanhua Zhu *Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188 Shizi Street, Soochow, 215006, Jiangsu Province, China.
Chengbai Li *Department of Urology, Wuxi 9th People's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, 999 Liangxi Road, Wuxi, 214000, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yinsheng GuoDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188 Shizi Street, Soochow, 215006, Jiangsu Province, China.
Lu SunDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188 Shizi Street, Soochow, 215006, Jiangsu Province, China.
Tao JinMingxu Technology Co., Ltd., 1228 Jiangchang Road, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Ziyue WangMingxu Technology Co., Ltd., 1228 Jiangchang Road, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Shiqing LiDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188 Shizi Street, Soochow, 215006, Jiangsu Province, China. li_sdfyy@foxmail.com.
Feng ZhouDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188 Shizi Street, Soochow, 215006, Jiangsu Province, China. zhoufeng01@suda.edu.cn.

Funding

Gusu Medical Talent Foundation GSWS2020021Key R&D Program of Jiangsu Province BE2021651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to use deep learning (DL) of intraoperative images of urinary stones to predict the composition of urinary stones. In this way, the laser frequency and intensity can be adjusted in real time to reduce operation time and surgical trauma. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 490 patients who underwent holmium laser surgery during the two-year period from March 2021 to March 2023 and had stone analysis results were collected by the stone laboratory. A total of 1658 intraoperative stone images were obtained. The eight stone categories with the highest number of stones were selected by sorting. Single component stones include calcium oxalate monohydrate (W1), calcium oxalate dihydrate (W2), magnesium ammonium phosphate hexahydrate, apatite carbonate (CH) and anhydrous uric acid (U). Mixed stones include W2 + U, W1 + W2 and W1 + CH. All stones have intraoperative videos. More than 20 intraoperative high-resolution images of the stones, including the surface and core of the stones, were available for each patient via FFmpeg command screenshots. The deep convolutional neural network (CNN) ResNet-101 (ResNet, Microsoft) was applied to each image as a multiclass classification model.

resultsThe composition prediction rates for each component were as follows: calcium oxalate monohydrate 99% (n = 142), calcium oxalate dihydrate 100% (n = 29), apatite carbonate 100% (n = 131), anhydrous uric acid 98% (n = 57), W1 + W2 100% (n = 82), W1 + CH 100% ( n = 20) and W2 + U 100% (n = 24). The overall weighted recall of the cellular neural network component analysis for the entire cohort was 99%.

conclusionThis preliminary study suggests that DL is a promising method for identifying urinary stone components from intraoperative endoscopic images. Compared to intraoperative identification of stone components by the human eye, DL can discriminate single and mixed stone components more accurately and quickly. At the same time, based on the training of stone images in vitro, it is closer to the clinical application of stone images in vivo. This technology can be used to identify the composition of stones in real time and to adjust the frequency and energy intensity of the holmium laser in time. The prediction of stone composition can significantly shorten the operation time, improve the efficiency of stone surgery and prevent the risk of postoperative infection.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiUrinary CalculiApatitesCalcium OxalateCarbonatesHumansMachine LearningUric AcidApatitesCalcium OxalatecarboapatiteCarbonatesUric AcidAutomatic recognitionDeep learningKidney stonesMorpho-constitutional analysis of urinary stonesUreteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID38172816
PMCPMC10765800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.