ArticleBMC urology2024
Predicting stone composition via machine-learning models trained on intra-operative endoscopic digital images.
Article in BMC urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart Lithotripsy: Lasers, Energy Sources and Efficiency.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Study on automatic recognition of stone composition in intraoperative endoscopic images-a single center study.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Article
- Composition and Biochemical Determinants of Renal Stones: A Comprehensive Analysis of Urinary and Serum Mineral Profiles.Urology research & practice · 2026Article
- A feasibility study on utility of a new digital disposable semirigid nephroscope for Suction mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Comparing artificial intelligence and healthcare professional performance in surgical and interventional video analysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- The role of artificial intelligence in advancing urologic care: From diagnostics to therapeutics.Surgery in practice and science · 2026Review
- Comprehensive analysis of 55,213 stones: understanding common morphological associations advances endoscopic stone recognition and AI integration.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Agreement Between Visual Assessment of Urinary Stones Morphology During Endo-Urological Procedure and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy-based Composition Analysis: An Observational Study.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2025Observational
- Predictors and associations of complications in ureteroscopy for stone disease using AI: outcomes from the FLEXOR registry.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- A novel predictive method for URS and laser lithotripsy using machine learning and explainable AI: results from the FLEXOR international database.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Kidney Stones as Minerals: How Methods from Geology Could Inform Urolithiasis Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Investigation and quantification of composition variability in urinary stone analysis.Investigative and clinical urology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to use deep learning (DL) of intraoperative images of urinary stones to predict the composition of urinary stones. In this way, the laser frequency and intensity can be adjusted in real time to reduce operation time and surgical trauma. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 490 patients who underwent holmium laser surgery during the two-year period from March 2021 to March 2023 and had stone analysis results were collected by the stone laboratory. A total of 1658 intraoperative stone images were obtained. The eight stone categories with the highest number of stones were selected by sorting. Single component stones include calcium oxalate monohydrate (W1), calcium oxalate dihydrate (W2), magnesium ammonium phosphate hexahydrate, apatite carbonate (CH) and anhydrous uric acid (U). Mixed stones include W2 + U, W1 + W2 and W1 + CH. All stones have intraoperative videos. More than 20 intraoperative high-resolution images of the stones, including the surface and core of the stones, were available for each patient via FFmpeg command screenshots. The deep convolutional neural network (CNN) ResNet-101 (ResNet, Microsoft) was applied to each image as a multiclass classification model.
resultsThe composition prediction rates for each component were as follows: calcium oxalate monohydrate 99% (n = 142), calcium oxalate dihydrate 100% (n = 29), apatite carbonate 100% (n = 131), anhydrous uric acid 98% (n = 57), W1 + W2 100% (n = 82), W1 + CH 100% ( n = 20) and W2 + U 100% (n = 24). The overall weighted recall of the cellular neural network component analysis for the entire cohort was 99%.
conclusionThis preliminary study suggests that DL is a promising method for identifying urinary stone components from intraoperative endoscopic images. Compared to intraoperative identification of stone components by the human eye, DL can discriminate single and mixed stone components more accurately and quickly. At the same time, based on the training of stone images in vitro, it is closer to the clinical application of stone images in vivo. This technology can be used to identify the composition of stones in real time and to adjust the frequency and energy intensity of the holmium laser in time. The prediction of stone composition can significantly shorten the operation time, improve the efficiency of stone surgery and prevent the risk of postoperative infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.